Table 3.
The selected reviewed papers that applied classification algorithm for forest fire detection.
Authors | Year | Method | Architecture | Accuracy | Application | Augmentation | Type of Data |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Priya et al. [66] | 2019 | CNN | Inception V3 | Accuracy - 98% | Classification | No | Satellite Image |
Arteaga et al. [2] | 2020 | CNN | ResNet + VGG | Accuracy - 99.5% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Benzekri et al. [71] | 2020 | RNN, LSTM and GRU | RNN, LSTM, GRU | Accuracy - 99.89% | Classification | No | Image |
de Almeida et al. [43] | 2020 | CNN | ResNet18 | Specificity - 99% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Rahul et al. [70] | 2020 | CNN | ResNet-50, VGG-16, DenseNet-121 | Accuracy - 92.27% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Ban et al. [69] | 2020 | CNN | CNN | Accuracy - 83.53% | Classification | No | Satellite Image |
Jiang et al. [73] | 2021 | CNN | BP NN, GA, SVM, GA-BP | Accuracy - 95% | Classification | No | Image |
Ghosh and Kumar [83] | 2022 | CNN | RNN | Accuracy - 99.62% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Kang et al. [82] | 2022 | CNN | CNN & RF | Accuracy - 98% | Classification | Yes | Satellite Image |
Khan and Khan [78] | 2022 | CNN | FFireNet, MobileNetV2 | Accuracy - 98.42% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Mashraqi et al. [90] | 2022 | DIFFDC-MDL | hybrid LSTM-RNN, MobileNet V2 | Accuracy - 99.38%. | Classification | No | Image |
Mohammad et al. [81] | 2022 | CNN | Resnet 50, GoogleNet, CNN-9 Layers, MobileNet, InceptionV3, AlexNet | Accuracy - 99.42% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Mohammed [39] | 2022 | CNN | Inception-ResNet | Accuracy - 99.09% | Classification | Yes | Image |
Gayathri et al. [80] | 2022 | CNN | CNN | Accuracy - 96% | Classification | No | Image |
Alice et al. [92] | 2023 | Deep Transfer Learning | Quasi Recurrent Neural Network (QRNN), ResNet50 and optimize parameter used Atom Search Optimizer | Accuracy - 97.33% | Classification | No | Image |