Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 1;26(12):2790–2801. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023001969

Table 3.

Effects of FOP disclosures on accuracy of assessing drink ingredients and product attitudes

Novel drink experiment (E1) Existing drink experiment (E2)
Control (claims only) (a) Claims and disclosure (b) Disclosure only (c) Control (no disclosure) (a) Claims and disclosure (b)
Sample size 213 219 216 327 321
Accuracy % 95 % CI % 95 % CI % 95 % CI P-value Accurate % 95 % CI % 95 % CI P-value Accurate
Added sugar
 Fruit drink 86·9 82, 91 87·2 82, 91 88·0 83, 92 0·940 Yes 78·9 74, 83 87·9 84, 91 0·002 * Yes
 Flavoured water 76·5 70, 82 84·0 79, 88 86·6 81, 91 0·018 Yes 75·5 71, 80 85·7 81, 89 0·001 * Yes
 100 % juice 56·8 50, 63 70·8 64, 76 75·0 69, 80 <0·001 * No 70·6 65, 75 80·1 75, 84 0·005 * No
 Juice/water blend 36·6 30, 43 62·6 56, 69 69·4 63, 75 <0·001 * No 65·7 60, 71 77·3 72, 82 0·001 * No
NNS
 Fruit drink 47·9 41, 55 72·1 66, 78 72·7 66, 78 <0·001 * Yes 65·1 60, 70 78·8 74, 83 <0·001 * No
 Flavoured water 44·1 38, 51 72·1 66, 78 76·9 71, 82 <0·001 * Yes 45·3 40, 51 75·7 71, 80 <0·001 * Yes
 100 % juice 70·4 64, 76 78·5 73, 83 86·1 81, 90 <0·001 * No 72·5 67, 77 81·3 77, 85 0·008 * No
 Juice/water blend 60·6 54, 67 74·0 68, 79 79·6 74, 84 0·005 * No 69·4 64, 74 77·9 73, 82 0·015 * No
Percent juice
 Fruit drink 49·8 43, 56 63·5 57, 70 66·7 60, 73 0·001 * 0–20 % 53·8 48, 59 67·6 62, 72 <0·001 * 0–20 %
 Flavoured water 53·5 47, 60 64·4 58, 70 67·1 61, 73 0·009 * 0–20 % 56·9 51, 62 67·3 62, 72 0·006 * 0–20 %
 100 % juice 62·4 56, 76 67·1 61, 73 70·4 64, 76 0·216 90–100 % 71·6 66, 76 74·1 69, 79 0·460 90–100 %
 Juice/water blend 42·7 36, 49 57·1 50, 63 63·0 56, 69 <0·001 * 25–40 % 59·0 54, 64 75·4 70, 80 <0·001 * 45–60 %

FOP, front-of-package; NNS, non-nutritive sweetener.

*

Significant after Bonferroni–Holm correction (P = 0·05 adjusted for fourteen comparisons).

Accuracy assessed as follows: proportion of participants who selected the accurate response. Significant differences between conditions assessed using Kruskal–Wallis (E1) and chi-square (E2).

Differences between conditions in product attitudes assessed using multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) (E1) and t tests (E2).