Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 27;64(15):36. doi: 10.1167/iovs.64.15.36

Table 2.

Distribution of Clinical, Histopathological, and Genetic Features in Patients With UM with Low PRAME and High PRAME (total 80) from the TCGA Study

Patients, no. (%)§,||
Feature Low PRAME n = 40 (50%) High PRAME n = 40 (50%) P Value
Sex
 Male 22 (55%) 23 (57%) 0.82*
 Female 18 (45%) 17 (42%)
Age at enucleation 63.68 (39–86) 59.63 (22–86) 0.24
Largest basal diameter 15.65 (8–25) 17.52 (11–25) 0.03
Thickness 10.67 (6–16) 10.91 (4–16) 0.54
Mitotic count
 0–5 32 (80%) 31 (77%) 0.47
 >5–10 4 (10%) 7 (17%)
 >11 4 (10%) 2 ( 5%)
Cell type
 Spindle cell 26 (65%) 17 (42%) 0.04*
 Epithelioid-mixed cell 14 (35%) 23 (57%)
Ciliary body involvement
 No 28 (70%) 26 (65%) 0.63*
 Yes 12 (30%) 14 (35%)
Extrascleral extension
 None 40 (100%) 34 (85%) 0.01
 < 5 mm 0 (0%) 3 (7.5%)
 >= 5 mm 0 (0%) 3 (7.5%)
TNM stage
 I-IIB 21 (52%) 15 (37%) 0.18*
 IIIA-IV 19 (19%) 25 (44%)
Tumor pigmentation
 Light 28 (70%) 11 (28%) 0.001*
 Mixed 7 (18%) 20 (50%)
 Heavy 5 (13%) 5 (23%)
Chromosome 3 status
 Disomy 21 (52%) 17 (42%) 0.37*
 Monosomy 19 (47%) 23 (57%)
8q status
 Normal 19 (47%) 2 ( 5%) <0.001*
 Gain 11 (27%) 16 (40%)
 Amplification 10 (25%) 22 (55%)
6p status
 Normal 21 (52%) 14 (35%) 0.11*
 Gain 19 (47%) 26 (65%)
BAP1 mutation
 BAP1 wild type 25 (63%) 20 (50%) 0.26*
 BAP1 mutated 15 (38%) 20 (50%)
*

Pearson's χ2 test.

Likelihood ratio.

Mann Whitney U test.

§

Percentages are rounded and may not total 100.

||

Percentages were calculated excluding missing data.