Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 4;32(2):202–214. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_43_23

Table 1.

Quality assessment of studies

Study Selection Comparability Outcome Total score (out of 10)
Agrawal et al.[23] 4 1 1 6
Baethge et al.[24] 2 0 2 4
Braga et al.[25] 4 2 2 8
Dehert et al.[26] 2 2 1 5
Deng et al.[27] 3 1 3 7
Denissoff et al.[28] 3 1 2 6
Etyemez et al.[29] 3 0 3 6
Feingold et al.[30] 4 1 3 8
Henquit et al.[31] 4 1 2 7
Johnson et al.[32] 3 1 2 6
Katz et al.[33] 1 1 3 5
Kvitland et al.[34] 2 1 1 4
Lagerberg et al.[35] 2 1 1 4
Lagerberg et al.[36] 2 1 1 4
Marwaha et al.[37] 3 1 2 6
Lev –Ran et al.[38] 2 1 1 4
Soler et al.[39] 3 1 0 4
Stone et al.[40] 2 0 0 2
Shah et al.[11] 1 0 0 1
Strakowski et al.[6] 3 0 3 6
Taub et al.[41] 2 0 0 2
Van Laar et al.[19] 3 1 1 5
Weinstock et al.[42] 1 0 0 1
Zorilla et al.[43] 1 1 2 4
Tjissen et al.[44] 4 1 3 8