Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;56(4):753–759. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00536-z

Table 2.

Negative binomial regression model of hopelessness

Characteristics Hopelessnessa
(N = 5008)
IRR 95% CI
Chronic illness 1.11** [1.06, 1.16]
Race (African American) 0.931* [0.869, 0.998]
Gender (Male) 1.00 [0.956, 1.05]
Age
 18 to 24
 25 to 34 0.998 [0.925, 1.08]
 35 to 54 1.03 [0.953, 1.11]
 55 and over 0.967 [0.892, 1.05]
Education
 0–11 years
 12 years 0.883** [0.837, 0.931]
 13–15 years 0.814** [0.771, 0.859]
 Greater than 16 years 0.779** [0.736, 0.826]
Incomeb
 0–9999
 10,000–19,999 0.931* [0.867, 0.999]
 20,000–34,999 0.858** [0.796, 0.925]
 35,000–69,999 0.837** [0.782, 0.896]
 70,000 or more 0.829** [0.751, 0.917]
Work
 Employed
 Unemployed 1.07 [0.997, 1.16]
 Not in labor force 1.07* [1.00, 1.14]
Spiritualityc 0.943** [0.918, 0.969]

Numbers in column headings represent unweighted values. All analyses incorporate the NSAL sample weighting strategy

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

aMeasured as the presence of heart disease, cancer, stroke or diabetes

bMeasured as annual household income

c4 point scale 1 = Not spiritual at all, 2 = Not too spiritual, 3 = Fairly spiritual, 4 = Very spiritual