Skip to main content
. 2005 Mar;79(6):3429–3437. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.6.3429-3437.2005

TABLE 5.

Microscopic liver lesions in control, oronasal, and i.v. group chickensa

Group No. of chickens with lesions (mean score) at indicated dpi
1 3 5 7 10 13 16 20 24 28 35 42 56
Control 2 (1.5) 2 (3.5) 2 (1.5) 1 (1.5) 1 (1.0) 1 (3.0)b 2 (2.0) 1 (1.0) 2 (1.5) 1 (0.5) 1 (1.0) 2 (2.0) 4 (2.25)
Oronasal 2 (2.5) 2 (3.0) 2 (3.0) 2 (3.0) 2 (2.5) 2 (3.0) 2 (3.0) 2 (3.0) 2 (2.5) 2 (3.0) 2 (2.0) 2 (2.5) 4 (1.5)
i.v. 2 (2.5) 2 (2.5) 2 (2.5) 2 (2.0) 2 (4.0) 2 (3.0) 2 (3.5) 2 (2.5) 1 (2.0)b 2 (1.5) 2 (2.5) 2 (2.5) 5 (2.2)
a

Two chickens were necropsied on each dpi from 1 to 42 dpi, and the remaining chickens (five, four, and four chickens from the i.v., oronasal, and control groups, respectively) were necropsied at 56 dpi. No chickens were necropsied at 49 dpi. The liver lesions included lymphoplasmacytic periphlebitis, phlebitis, and necrotic lesions.

b

Only one chicken sample was available.