Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 6;45(1):18–31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad720

Table 1.

General overview of the differences in plaque, patients, and thrombus characteristics between eroded and ruptured plaques

Plaque erosion Plaque rupture References
Plaque composition Little or no lipid core Large lipid pool 13–17
Endothelial denudation Greater necrotic core
Smooth muscle cells rich Thin fibrous cap
Matrix rich (proteoglycan, glycosaminoglycan, hyaluronic acid) Abundant monocytes, macrophages, and foam cells
Neutrophil predominance Greater plaque burden
Plaque location
 LAD 40%–66% 40%–46% 32–36
 RCA 22%–30.6% 35%–59% 32–36
 LCX 8.1%–14.9% 9.2%–15.6% 32–36
Sex and age differences a
 Female <50 years: <50 years: 37–39
74.0%–77.1% 22.9%–26.0%
>50 years: >50 years:
30.3%–44.1% 55.9%–69.7%
 Male <50 years: <50 years: 37–39
45.6%–65.2% 34.8%–53.4%
>50 years: >50 years:
18.1%–43.4% 56.5%–81.9%
Clinical presentation NSTEMI STEMI 23
Thrombus composition Non-occlusive Occlusive 40–43
Platelet rich Platelet and fibrin rich
RBCs poor Abundant RBCs
NETs present

LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex artery; NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps; NSTEMI, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; RBC, red blood cells; RCA, right coronary artery; STEMI, ST elevation myocardial infarction.

aOnly post-mortem studies.