Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2023 Nov 4;284:120444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120444

Table 4.

Results of non-parametric statistical tests to verify changes of gamma power (30–80 Hz) during the planning and execution windows. A. Comparison of gamma ERS to short and long target distance in mov0 and mov3 with Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. B. Comparison of the effects of practice in VSEQ and ROT on gamma ERS amplitude to short and long target distance trials in mov0 and mov3 tested with Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. C. Direct comparisons between mov0 and mov3 on the amplitude of gamma oscillations performed with Kruskal-Wallis Tests. Significant p-values are in bold.

A. T SE STD Test p

Planning
Target mov0 1219 106.68 5.21 0.0000002
Short vs Long
mov3 1180 106.68 4.85 0.0000001
Execution
mov0 1214 106.68 5.16 0.0000002
mov3 1213 106.68 5.16 0.0000002

B. T SE STD Test p

Task Planning mov0
ROT vs VSEQ
 short 310 52.83 −0.23 0.82
 long 285 52.83 −0.70 0.48
Planning mov3
 short 273 52.83 −0.93 0.35
 long 317 52.83 −0.09 0.92
Execution mov0
 short 330 52.83 0.15 0.88
 long 305 52.83 −0.32 0.75
Execution mov3
 short 310 52.83 −0.23 0.82
 long 283 52.83 −0.74 0.46

C. U SE STD Test p

Block Planning
mov0 vs. mov3 All tasks
 short 247 106.68 −3.90 0.0001
 long 276 106.68 −3.63 0.0003
ROT s short 95 43.91 −2.46 0.014
 Long 97 43.91 −2.41 0.016
VSEQ sshort 35 32.88 −3.13 0.002
 long 47 32.88 −2.77 0.006
Execution
All tasks
 short 192 106.68 −4.41 0.0000001
 long 160 106.68 −4.71 0.000002
ROT
 short 72 43.91 −2.98 0.003
 long 61 43.91 −3.23 0.001
VSEQ
 sshort 29 32.88 −3.31 0.001
 long 21 32.88 −3.56 0.0004