Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 19;36:12135. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.12135

TABLE 4.

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis for the prediction of DCGF a .

Variables b Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) p-value Data (n)
Model 1 (biopsy variables) 72
 IRRAT 1.93 (0.96–3.89) 0.067
 CI3comp (ci+ct+[cgx2]) 1.97 (0.97–3.99) 0.059
 ciprob 1.24 (0.54–2.83) 0.61
Model 2 (biopsy and clinical variables) 72
 IRRAT 1.44 (0.66–3.14) 0.36
 CI3comp (ci+ct+[cgx2]) 1.36 (0.64–2.86) 0.42
 ciprob 0.96 (0.42–2.19) 0.92
 Recipient age (years) 0.54 (0.31–0.95) 0.033
 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 0.32 (0.15–0.70) 0.005
 UPCR at Bx (mg/g) 1.87 (0.87–4.03) 0.11

cg, glomerular double contours; ci, interstitial fibrosis; ciprob, molecular classifier reflecting the probability of histologic ci lesion score >1; ct, tubular atrophy; cv, intimal fibrous thickening; DCGF, death-censored graft survival; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IRRAT, transcript set associated with injury-repair response; UPCR, urinary protein/creatinine ratio.

a

Adjusted models (model 1: biopsy variables; model 2: biopsy plus clinical variables) included variables (morphologic indices, molecular scores and/or clinical parameters) associated with DCGF, in univariable analysis (see Table 3).

b

For continuous variables and ordinal categorical variables, hazard ratios were calculated per increase from the first to the third quartile.