Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 19;14:1287961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1287961

Table 2.

Summary of the Study 2’s sample characteristics.

Variable yAPD n = 150 (49.2%) nAPD n = 155 (51.8%) Total n = 305 Statistics
Demographics
Age 41.4 ± 8.41 43.9 ± 11.4 43 ± 10.3 U = 10,494, n.s.
Gender Male 69 (46%) 74 (47.7%) 143 (46.9%) X2=0.433, n.s.
Female 80 (53.3%) 79 (50.9%) 159 (52.1%)
Othera 1 (0.6%) 2 (1.2%) 3 (0.9%)
Education Primary school or lessb 1 (0.6%) 1 (0.3%) X2=11.7, n.s.
High School or equivalent 69 (46%) 62 (40%) 131 (42.9%)
B.A 40 (26.6%) 51 (32.9%) 91 (29.8%)
Master’s Degree and above 39 (26%) 39 (25.1%) 78 (25.5%)
Family status Single 45 (30%) 36 (23.2%) 171 (56%) X2=23.4, n.s.
Married 81 (54%) 90 (58%) 40 (13.1%)
Divorced 16 (10.6%) 24 (15.4%) 81 (26.5%)
Other 8 (5.3%) 5 (3.2%) 13 (0. 4%)
Income Below average 54 (36%) 56 (36.1%) 110 (36%) X2=34.2, n.s.
Average 37 (24.6%) 32 (20.6%) 69 (22.6%)
Above average 50 (33.3%) 57 (36.7%) 107 (35%)
Ayahuasca parameters
Local/neo-shamanic 55 (36.6%) 50 (32.2%) 105 (34.4%) X2=4.29, n.s.
Setting Religious, indigenous, or other 95 (63.3%) 105 (67.7) 200 (65.6%)
Lifetime intake 1–10 56 (37.3%) 94 (60.6%) 150 (49.2%) U = 8,539, p < 0.01
11–20 22 (14.6%) 22 (14.1%) 44 (14.4%)
21–50 29 (19.3%) 16 (10.3%) 44 (14.4%)
51–100 20 (13.3%) 13 (8.3%) 33 (10.8%)
100+ 23 (15.3%) 11 (7%) 34 (11.1%)
Last intake Last month or less 48 (23%) 20 (12.9%) 68 (22.3%) U = 9,280, p < 0.01
Past 1–3 months 25 (16.6%) 34 (21.9%) 59 (19.3%)
Past 3–6 months 21 (14%) 23 (14.8) 44 (14.4%)
Past 6 months to 1 year 18 (12%) 27 (17.4%) 45 (14.8%)
Past 1 year to 3 years 21 (26%) 27 (17.4%) 48 (15.7%)
More than 3 years ago 17 (11.3%) 14 (0.9%) 41 (13.5%)
Age of first intake 33.8 ± 8.7 37.1 ± 11 35.5 ± 10 U = 9,530, p < 0.05

The table presents data on demographic characteristics and ayahuasca use parameters for both the yAPD and nAPD groups. Bold markings indicate statistically significant findings. aOnly male and female participants were compared, as other gender identities were not included in the statistical analysis due to insufficient sample sizes for meaningful comparison. Likewise, bThe category “Primary school or less” was not included in the statistical analysis. *Percentages reported do not always add up to 100% as some participants did not answer certain questions.