Table 1.

Comparison of independent variables for different types of S/EPs during all investigated static tasks (i.e., descriptive statistics and one-way repeated measures ANOVA outcomes of shoulder and elbow ROM in different S/EP conditions)

Variables		No S/EPs	Bauer Vapor	Bauer Nsx	Vik-Max	Heilong	IBX	$p$	$\mathit{F}$	${\eta }_p^2$
Shoulder	Flex	167.6 ± 4.52,3,4,5,6	150.9 ± 11.81	151.7 ± 14.21	150.6 ± 10.61	147.6 ± 10.31	153.0 ± 8.31	<0.01	7.362	0.479
	Ext	46.2 ± 7.42,4,5,6	39.1 ± 10.51	41.8 ± 13.05	38.1 ± 9.91	35.7 ± 10.61,3	39.5 ± 8.71	0.013	3.345	0.295
	Add	45.7 ± 12.24,5,6	41.1 ± 8.5	41.7 ± 11.7	36.3 ± 11.01	38.3 ± 15.21	36.4 ± 12.01	0.016	3.152	0.259
	Abd	166.2 ± 7.72,3,4,5,6	154.9 ± 7.61,4,5	152.2 ± 7.71,5	143.0 ± 15.61,2	141.8 ± 19.21,2,3,6	152.9 ± 5.81,5	<0.01	6.653	0.454
	Int Rot	70.7 ± 5.73,4,5,6	65.8 ± 7.61,4,5,6	63.9 ± 9.11,4,5	56.5 ± 7.71,2,3	57.5 ± 7.81,2,3	59.7 ± 9.71,2	<0.01	9.466	0.542
	Ext Rot	138.6 ± 4.42,3,4,5,6	64.9 ± 6.14	60.0 ± 13.51	56.9 ± 9.41,2	60.3 ± 10.71	59.1 ± 5.01	<0.01	4.378	0.354
Elbow	Flex	77.7 ± 9.72,3,4,5,6	100.9 ± 19.71,4	111.2 ± 18.11	115.3 ± 12.71,2	105.1 ± 23.01	105.5 ± 18.71	<0.01	10.622	0.570
	Pro	77.7 ± 9.72,3,4,5,6	65.1 ± 14.01	66.2 ± 12.91	64.3 ± 13.41	65.0 ± 13.71	62.6 ± 9.61	0.035	3.651	0.313
	Sup	74.6 ± 8.62,4,5,6	65.1 ± 13.21	70.1 ± 10.2	67.2 ± 12.71	64.3 ± 16.21	64.8 ± 14.11	0.017	3.175	0.284

Note that 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are significantly different from No S/EPs, Bauer Vapor, Bauer NSX, Vik-Max, Heilong, and IBX, respectively. S/EPs; shoulder and elbow pads; ROM, range of motion; ANOVA, analysis of variance.