Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 28;13(12):e077806. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077806

Table 4.

The multivariate regression analysis of PEP

Risk factors OR (univariable) OR (multivariate)
Age groups ≤40 years vs ≥65 years 3.16 (95% CI: 1.37 to 8.18, p=0.010) 2.84 (95% CI: 1.20 to 7.46, p=0.023)
≤40 years vs 41–65 years 1.26 (95% CI: 0.65 to 2.46, p=0.495) 1.15 (95% CI: 0.58 to 2.29, p=0.694)
Female gender 0.71 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.30, p=0.274) 0.89 (95% CI: 0.45 to 1.69, p=0.719)
Pancreatic cannulation 4.63 (95% CI: 2.51 to 8.59, p<0.001) 3.64 (95% CI: 1.93 to 6.92, p<0.001)
Pancreatic injection 2.00 (95% CI: 0.80 to 4.30, p=0.101) 0.64 (95% CI: 0.41 to 1.85, p=0.219)
Pancreatic stenting 2.97 (95% CI: 1.00 to 7.11, p=0.026) 1.2 (95% CI: 0.54 to 3.18, p=0.935)
Native papilla 0.33 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.66, p=0.003) 0.46 (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.97, p=0.05)

P value<0.05 is considered significant.

The bold values indicates the significant p values and their cooresponding OR and 95% CI

PEP, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.