Table 4.
The multivariate regression analysis of PEP
| Risk factors | OR (univariable) | OR (multivariate) | |
| Age groups | ≤40 years vs ≥65 years | 3.16 (95% CI: 1.37 to 8.18, p=0.010) | 2.84 (95% CI: 1.20 to 7.46, p=0.023) |
| ≤40 years vs 41–65 years | 1.26 (95% CI: 0.65 to 2.46, p=0.495) | 1.15 (95% CI: 0.58 to 2.29, p=0.694) | |
| Female gender | 0.71 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.30, p=0.274) | 0.89 (95% CI: 0.45 to 1.69, p=0.719) | |
| Pancreatic cannulation | 4.63 (95% CI: 2.51 to 8.59, p<0.001) | 3.64 (95% CI: 1.93 to 6.92, p<0.001) | |
| Pancreatic injection | 2.00 (95% CI: 0.80 to 4.30, p=0.101) | 0.64 (95% CI: 0.41 to 1.85, p=0.219) | |
| Pancreatic stenting | 2.97 (95% CI: 1.00 to 7.11, p=0.026) | 1.2 (95% CI: 0.54 to 3.18, p=0.935) | |
| Native papilla | 0.33 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.66, p=0.003) | 0.46 (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.97, p=0.05) | |
P value<0.05 is considered significant.
The bold values indicates the significant p values and their cooresponding OR and 95% CI
PEP, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.