Skip to main content
. 1999 Apr 26;1999(2):CD001526. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001526

Crawford 1989.

Methods Randomization: Central dynamic centralization 
 Double‐blinded: yes 
 Withdrawals documented: partial 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis (ITT): modified
Participants Geographic setting: US 
 Number enrolled: 617 
 Number randomized, control: 300 
 Number analyzed, control: 300 
 Number randomized, treatment: 303 
 Number analyzed, treatment: 303 
 Median/mean age control group: 67 
 Median/mean age treatment group: 67
Interventions Control: leuprolide 1 mg sc q.d. plus placebo 
 Treatment: leuprolide 1 mg sc q.d. plus flutamide 750 mg 
 Median time to follow‐up: NA 
 Lost to follow‐up: NA
Outcomes Overall survival 
 Cancer‐specific survival 
 Progression‐related outcomes 
 Time to treatment failure 
 Adverse events
Notes Percentage M1 disease, control: 100% 
 Percentage M1 disease, treatment: 100% 
 Percentage poorly differentiated tumor, control: NA 
 Percentage poorly differentiated tumor, treatment: NA
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate