Skip to main content
. 1999 Apr 26;1999(2):CD001526. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001526

Fourcade 1990.

Methods Multicenter 
 Randomization: Not specified 
 Double‐blinded: yes 
 Withdrawals documented: no 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis (ITT): yes
Participants Geographic setting: France 
 Number enrolled: 245 
 Number randomized, control: 125 
 Number analyzed, control: 125 
 Number randomized, treatment: 120 
 Number analyzed, treatment: 120 
 Median/mean age control group: 74 
 Median/mean age treatment group: 74
Interventions Control: goserelin 3.6 mg sc 
 Treatment: goserelin 3.6 mg sc plus flutamide 750 mg 
 Median time to follow‐up: NA 
 Lost to follow‐up: NA
Outcomes Overall survival 
 Cancer‐specific survival 
 Progression‐related outcomes 
 Time to treatment failure 
 Adverse events
Notes Percentage M1 disease, control: 84% 
 Percentage M1 disease, treatment: 81% 
 Percentage poorly differentiated tumor, control: 39% 
 Percentage poorly differentiated tumor, treatment: 40%
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear