Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Jul 19;52(1):36–47. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03319-6

Piezoelectric Transformer-Based High-Voltage Pulse Generator Using Wide-Bandgap Semiconductors for Medical Electroporation Therapy

Ajay M Chole 1,, Maeve Duffy 1
PMCID: PMC10761399  PMID: 37468687

Abstract

In this paper, a new application of Piezoelectric Transformer (PT)-based power converters to generate high-voltage (HV) bipolar pulses for medical electroporation therapy is proposed. In particular, PT-based power conversion is investigated as an alternative to magnetics-based approaches of generating HV from a relatively low-voltage (LV) input source for application in electroporation therapy. The detailed PT-based system design and selection of wide bandgap semiconductor switches such as GaN FETs, high-voltage SiC diodes and SiC MOSFETs, as well as simulation results to demonstrate proof-of-concept using LTSpice are presented. Preliminary experimental results of the PT-based capacitor charger are shown, and work is ongoing to develop a complete hardware prototype of the proposed HV pulse generator.

Keywords: Piezoelectric transformer, Wide-bandgap power semiconductors, High-voltage pulse generator, Electroporation

Introduction

The permeability of cell membranes and tissues is enhanced when exposed to pulsed electric fields of a high amplitude and short duration. This enhancement in permeability is attributed to the momentary formation of aqueous pores in the cell membrane, a process known as electroporation. Electroporation is a well-established technology in the field of medicine and biotechnology for applications such as the introduction of molecules into cells, cell-fusion, electrochemotherapy, tissue ablation, gene-therapy, and sterilization of water and liquid food [5].

Electroporation systems typically consist of at least two stages of power conversion as shown in Fig. 1. The first stage generally consists of a high-step-up DC/DC converter that charges a DC-link capacitor to a high voltage (HV, typically several kV) from a low-voltage (LV) source. The second stage is an inverter required to convert the DC voltage to a train of high-frequency HV pulses. The main focus of this paper is on the first stage; i.e. high step-up DC/DC converter.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Magnetics based HV pulse generator using capacitor charging principle

Voltage boosting DC/DC converters for capacitor charging application proposed in the literature are Boost, Buck-Boost, Flyback (isolated Buck-Boost) and LLC resonant converters [1], all of which require an inductor and/or transformer as an energy storage element. Similarly, most step-up DC/DC power conversion stages proposed for HV pulse generators for medical electroporation make use of either an inductor and/or a transformer [1, 5, 37].

Pulse generators based on topologies such as the Solid-State Marx Generator (SSMG) [7, 8, 26, 27, 32, 35], Capacitor-Diode Voltage Multiplier (CDVM) [28, 30], Switched Capacitor Voltage Multiplier (SCVM) [12, 14, 22] have no magnetic components, but may become bulky for high step-up ratios as a large number of capacitor stages and therefore switches with different voltage ratings would be needed. This work proposes a new alternative to magnetics-based HV pulse generators for medical electroporation, which may also compete with magnetic-less HV pulse generators such as SSMG, CDVM or SCVM.

PTs are a special type of transformers which are based on vibration rather than electromagnetics as a coupling medium to transfer input electrical energy to mechanical energy and then again back to electrical energy at the output with a different voltage amplitude [9, 11]. Compared to traditional electromagnetic transformers, PTs have advantages such as high power-density, low-electromagnetic interference (EMI), reduced weight, high-galvanic isolation, incombustibility, and comparable efficiency, particularly for high voltage step-up applications. For instance, a PT-based high-voltage CCFL backlight inverter was very popular for LCD displays in 2000-2010 [9]. The use of PTs in high-voltage DC capacitor charging has been previously demonstrated with a relatively small capacitance (less than 1 µF) for applications such as Electro-Active Polymer (EAP) actuators [2], automobile air-bag ignition systems [41] and pulsed-power systems [23].

In the proposed application of medical electroporation, the size of the DC capacitor is substantially larger, typically 100’s μF depending on the required pulse-width, pulse-number, acceptable voltage drop, pulse-power, losses and repetition frequency during a typical therapy session. Therefore, the PT-based converter power delivery, efficiency and dynamic response all need to be carefully considered to provide an optimized solution. The objective of this work is to explore and extend the application of PTs to generate HV pulses for electroporation at a better performance, size, weight, and cost compared to existing electromagnetic converter solutions [25, 29, 39].

A complete PT-based HV pulse generator with 24 Vdc input that outputs bipolar pulses up to 2 kV typical of those used in medical electroporation is designed and investigated using LTSpice simulation. A small-scale hardware prototype of a PT-based capacitor charger circuit has been built and tested using general-purpose low-cost standard silicon components to validate the concept. The experimental results successfully demonstrate the charging operation and verify the potential of the PT-based converter in medical electroporation therapy.

Work is ongoing to construct a full hardware prototype (i.e. PT-based capacitor charger and HV inverter circuits both working together) to determine the performance, size, and weight of the proposed solution, for comparison with commercially available medical electroporation power supplies

PT-Based HV Pulse Generator for Electroporation

Figure 2 shows a block diagram of the proposed HV pulse generator based on a step-up PT. It consists of a low-input voltage DC source followed by a DC-AC inverter stage to drive the PT close to its resonant frequency. The amplified high-frequency PT output voltage is rectified and supplied to a DC-link capacitor, Cdc, which charges to the required high-voltage (HV). The charging time depends on the capacitance value and the rated power of the PT. Once the DC-link capacitor is charged, the input inverter is switched OFF and the DC-link voltage is applied in pulses to the electrodes (represented here as an effective load resistance, RL), through an output full-bridge inverter that switches at the required pulse-width and frequency.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

PT-based HV pulse generator architecture for Electroporation

Full-Bridge LV Inverter

To obtain optimal performance, the PT should be driven with an AC sinusoidal voltage to extract full rated power at the output. Low-voltage (LV) inverter topologies proposed in the literature include a half-bridge [10], push–pull [36], single-switch class-E [20] or a full-bridge inverter [33], all of which generate square-wave voltages. In this paper, maximum power is transferred in both halves of the input AC cycle to take full advantage of commercially available PTs to fast-charge the HV capacitor, using a full-bridge inverter with Gallium Nitride (GaN) FETs. It is anticipated that the use of GaN devices will result in higher conversion efficiency and smaller converter size compared to standard silicon MOSFETs.

Series Inductor

If a square-wave voltage is directly applied to the PT, spikes occur in each cycle of the source current due to the PT input capacitance. These spikes may be reduced by adding a series inductor to form a low-pass filter with the PT input capacitance. Inductor-less driving of PTs by achieving Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) has been proposed in the literature. This would provide significant benefits in medical equipment applications, where the elimination of magnetic components is required to minimise EMI and switching losses. However, ZVS capable PTs require special consideration during their design [31] and currently they are not available commercially. As a commercial Rosen PT has been used to prove the concept in this paper, a low-pass filter series inductor, Lin, at the PT input is required.

Rosen Piezoelectric Transformer

Invented by Dr. Rosen in the 1950s, the Rosen-PT structure shown in Fig. 3 is a combination of a transverse mode piezoelectric actuator at the input (driver) section and a longitudinal mode piezoelectric transducer at the output (generator) section, each of which dominates around the PT resonant frequency [11]. Because of the inherent high voltage gain associated with Rosen-PTs, they are referred as high-voltage PTs.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Basic structure of Rosen PT [11]

The electrical equivalent circuit of the PT is shown in Fig. 4a, where R is the electrical equivalent of mechanical loss, L is an electrical equivalent of the PT mass, C is the equivalent of mechanical compliance, Cin and Cout represent static input and output capacitances, respectively. The series combination of R, L and C result in the circuit acting like a current source, which is more or less independent of the output load. The voltage transformation ratio is represented by an ideal electromagnetic transformer with turns ratio N. In Fig. 4b, the ideal transformer is replaced by interdependent voltage and current sources, which aids to speed-up computer simulations. It should be noted that this circuit only models the PT behaviour around primary resonance, and it does not account for higher order harmonic vibration modes.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

PT electrical equivalent circuit

Full-Bridge HV Rectifier

Due to the resonant characteristics of the PT, its output response to the square-wave inverter is a sinusoidal AC voltage and requires a rectifier-stage to convert it to DC for HV energy-storage capacitor charging. In this work, a silicon carbide (SiC) diode-based full-bridge [40] rectifier stage is proposed to obtain higher converter efficiency and power-density when compared to standard silicon rectifiers.

DC Link Capacitor

The DC-link capacitor is the main energy-storage component in the proposed system. The output of the HV rectifier is coupled to the DC-link capacitor Cdc, which forms a source of energy to the next power conversion stage, i.e. full-bridge HV inverter. The value of capacitance must be chosen such that it will present a constant (stiff) DC source for repetitive short pulses with acceptable voltage drop as per the requirement of the aimed medical electroporation therapy session.

Full-Bridge HV Inverter

The fully charged HV DC-link energy-storage capacitor is partially discharged to the electrodes through a HV inverter to produce high-amplitude bipolar-pulses at a required pulse-width, pulse-number, and repetition frequency. Recently, the requirement of very short HV pulses in the nanoseconds to microsecond range is growing for medical electroporation [5], therefore, a very fast HV semiconductor switch is required. Conventional silicon MOSFETs or IGBTs are slower and inefficient compared to latest generation SiC MOSFETs, hence in this research work, SiC MOSFETs are proposed for the output inverter.

HV Pulse Generator Design and Simulation

To demonstrate the proposed proof-of-concept, simulation results of a PT-based HV pulse generator for electroporation are presented in two stages, i.e., the HV capacitor charging circuit shown in Fig. 5 and a pulse-generator full-bridge SiC inverter shown later in Fig. 10.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

LTSpice schematic of the PT-based capacitor charger.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

LTSpice schematic of full-bridge SiC HV inverter

The generator is designed to provide a typical electroporation treatment protocol consisting of eight bursts of 50 bipolar square wave pulses (1 µs positive polarity, 1 µs pause, 1 µs negative polarity and 1 µs pause) at a burst repetition rate of 1 Hz [24] from a 24 V DC supply. To maintain the applied voltage amplitude high enough over the treatment time, the DC link capacitor, Cdc, needs to be chosen to limit its voltage drop according to:

12CdcVu2-Vl2Vl2RNpNbton, 1

where Vu and Vl are the upper and lower voltage amplitudes, R is the effective resistance presented by the tissue at the electrodes, Np is the number of pulses, Nb the number of bursts and ton is the pulse duration. In this case, assuming a voltage drop of less than 3.5%, with a maximum voltage of 2 kV and a load-resistance of 50 Ω to emulate the in vivo resistance of tissue between needle electrodes (typically in the range of 40 Ω to 110 Ω [6]), Cdc is calculated as 433.3 μF. Accounting for practical capacitor tolerances, Cdc was implemented by connecting three 3.8 kV 165 µF film capacitors each with 1.6 mΩ equivalent series resistance, ESR (FFLR6Z1656KJE, Kyocera) in parallel to provide a nominal capacitance of 495 μF.

Stage I: High Step-Up DC/DC Capacitor Charging Circuit

Figure 5 shows a circuit schematic of the PT-based capacitor charger implemented in LTSpice simulation using the commercial 6 W, 30 × 7.4 × 2.7 mm3, multilayer PT sample ELM-610 [13] considered in this work. This device was experimentally characterized and tested [4] to obtain equivalent circuit parameters of: Cin = 230 nF, R = 0.67 Ω, L = 1.125 mH, C = 8.5 nF, N = 57, Cout = 32 pF. The ESR values of input and output capacitances were estimated to be RESR_Cin = 63 mΩ and RESR_Cout = 452 Ω, respectively.

It should be noted that the range of commercial PTs available is quite limited, and therefore, circuit design is highly dependent on the particular models available. However, with increasing interest in magnetic-less power conversion solutions, it is expected that a wider range of models will become available in the near future.

Using simulation of the given PT equivalent circuit parameters, the series resonant frequencies of 51.5 kHz and 53.5 kHz were determined from the PT input impedance response when short circuited and open circuited, respectively, as shown in Fig. 6. This correlates with the quoted resonant frequency of 55 kHz (± 3%) under open circuit, room temperature and small signal conditions [13]. In capacitor charging applications, short-circuit (SC) corresponds to the uncharged capacitor, while open-circuit (OC) represents a fully-charged capacitor; therefore, the operating frequency of the input GaN inverter, f, is chosen as an intermediate value of 53 kHz for initial investigation.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Input impedance of ELM-610

The GaN FET EPC2035 (VDS = 60 V, IDS = 1.7 A) is chosen to obtain a high-efficiency bridge-inverter (T1 to T4) at the low-voltage input side. The series inductor is chosen as 22 µH [38] to form a low-pass filter with the PT input capacitance with a cut-off frequency around 78 kHz. The SiC diode GAP3SLT33-220FP (VRRM = 3.3 kV, IF = 0.3 A) is chosen for the HV diode-bridge rectifier (D1 to D4). Note that the junction capacitances and leakage-resistances of the HV diode bridge, and the ESR/leakage resistance of HV capacitor affect the overall circuit gain, all of which are non-linear and therefore need to be accounted for in design.

In order to produce accurate simulation results, the value of HV energy-storage capacitor needs to be scaled down because the capacitor charging time (~min) is very long relative to the operational time period, T = 1/f (~ 19 µs in this case). Therefore, Cdc is set at 1 µF, to enable investigation of the circuit performance over the charging time, and verification of simulations with measurements. This is possible because, due to the current source nature of the circuit, its performance at a given percentage charge level is the same regardless of capacitance value. This is shown in the waveforms of Figs. 7 and 8 which show the simulation results of the DC/DC converter using full LTSpice models of all semiconductor switches for a 0.4 s run when Cdc = 1 µF and a 2 s run when Cdc = 5 µF (five times longer).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Waveforms of a PT-based capacitor charger for Cdc = 5µF a full charging cycle, b zoomed in at 120 ms (Vout =  ~ 2 kV): PT input voltage (magenta), resonant branch current (teal), PT output current (red), PT output voltage (green) and load capacitor voltage (blue).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Waveforms of a PT-based capacitor charger for Cdc = 5 µF a full charging cycle, b zoomed in at 600 ms (Vout =  ~ 2 kV): PT input voltage (magenta), resonant branch current (teal), PT output current (red), PT output voltage (green) and load capacitor voltage (blue).

As mentioned, the PT initially sees the output load impedance as SC and tends towards OC as Cdc charges. The converter continues to charge Cdc until the maximum OC voltage is obtained for a given switching frequency and at given reflected load-impedance seen from PT output terminals. As can be observed, the circuit successfully charges the HV capacitor to 2 kV in approximately 0.12 s for Cdc = 1 µF and five times later at 0.6 s for 5 µF.

The output voltage waveform has a constant slope in both cases, confirming the circuit provides a constant charging current, while the PT resonant branch current is sinusoidal during charging (see expanded waveforms in Figs. 7 and 8b). In the full hardware prototype implementation, the input LV inverter bridge will be switched OFF as soon as 2 kV output is reached, thereby providing burst-mode control. As can be seen, the higher output voltage is possible, so long as the SiC voltage ratings are chosen to withstand such levels.

Calculations of the average PT power show that the rated power of 6 W is exceeded at an output voltage of ~ 1 kV at 53 kHz. The thermal performance of PTs was confirmed experimentally in previous works [15, 21] and it was found that PTs can be overloaded by up to 10 times their nominal power when operated under non-permanent excitation. Therefore, since the PT is not operating permanently at excess power levels and it can be controlled using burst-mode control, it is anticipated that the temperature rise within the PT will remain within its limits. Alternatively, to overcome this issue multiple PTs operating in parallel may be used to charge at a faster rate [17].

Performance Comparison and Frequency Optimization

To illustrate the performance of the PT-based capacitor charger circuit at different operating frequencies and using WBG versus silicon power semiconductor devices, extensive LTSpice simulations were performed to compare the respective implementations as shown in Table 1. Simulations were run for 1 s to ensure Cdc was fully charged.

Table 1.

WBG and Silicon-based implementation in LTSpice at Vdc = 24 V, Cdc = 1 µF

Device WBG-based implementation Silicon-based implementation
MOSFETs, T1 to T4 EPC2035, EPC Company, 60 V, 1.7 A IRF540, Vishay/Siliconix, 100 V, 20A
Inductor, Lf 22 μH
Piezoelectric Transformer ELM-610, 6 W
HV diodes, D1 to D4 GAP3SLT33-220FP, GeneSiC Semiconductor, 3.3 kV, 300 mA GP02D40, Vishay/Siliconix, 4 kV, 250 mA

The first observation was that for a given frequency, e.g. 53 kHz, the output voltage settles to 4.5 kV in the silicon-based implementation compared to 3.8 kV in the WBG-based implementation. This is most likely explained by differences in diode parasitic capacitances.

To compare the circuits’ performance for similar application conditions, results in Table 2 compare charging time and energy for a 1 µF load-capacitor charged to the same voltage; i.e. 3 kV with energy stored = 4.5 J, at an input voltage of 24 Vdc and operating frequencies of 52.5 kHz, 53 kHz, and 53.5 kHz. As can be seen, the WBG-based implementation has lower input energy and charging time thereby giving approximately 10% higher energy efficiency compared to the silicon implementation. Another important observation is that both implementations obtain highest efficiency at the switching frequency of 52.5 kHz indicating a higher voltage gain for the 1 µF load-capacitor as it is charged. Note that this frequency is the average resonant frequency between OC and SC conditions.

Table 2.

Simulation results of input energy and charging time for WBG- and silicon-based implementation to charge 1 µF capacitor to 3 kV at input voltage of 24 VDC

Frequency (kHz) WBG-based implementation Silicon-based implementation
Input energy (J) Charging time (ms) Input energy (J) Charging time (ms)
52.5 5 150 5.7 260
53 5.1 207 5.6 364
53.5 5.2 288 5.8 515

Further analysis of the LTSpice simulation results was carried out in each case to get an understanding of the average circuit power and efficiency during the charging process. The average powers as well as efficiencies were calculated for four switching cycles at several output voltage levels and are shown as a function of charging time in Fig. 9. As already observed, operation at 52.5 kHz offers better charging efficiency for both implementations, but at the cost of increased input average power. Solutions for addressing high PT power levels have been discussed above; i.e. connecting several PTs in parallel and operating in burst mode. It is also seen that power efficiency is 10% more in the WBG implementation.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Average input power and corresponding output powers and efficiencies

At all simulated operating frequencies, after the load-capacitor voltage settles at the OC voltage, all the input power is dissipated in the switching devices and the piezoelectric transformer, confirming that the PT must never be operated continuously when its output is OC.

Stage II: HV Bi-Polar Pulse Generation

Figure 10 shows a schematic diagram of the HV pulse generator using a charged HV capacitor as an input source in LTSpice simulation. While a low valued capacitor is used to illustrate the performance and characteristics of the capacitor charging in Stage I (based on available PTs and computational resources), the output pulse-generator stage is demonstrated using the 3.8 kV, 500 µF HV capacitor required for a standard electroporation treatment protocol. Based on the simulation results of Stage I with one single PT, the estimated time taken to charge a 500 µF capacitor to 2 kV is around 60 s. However, if five PTs are connected in parallel [17], the charge time would be approximately 12 s, which is significantly better than 2–3 min required for a recently proposed low-cost portable electroporator [34]. The SiC MOSFET G2R50MT33K rated at VDS = 3.3 kV and IDS = 44 A has been chosen for the output HV bridge-inverter (S1 to S4) which supplies HV bipolar pulses to the equivalent electrode load-resistance, chosen as Rload = 50 Ω.

Figure 11a shows the overall simulation results of the HV pulse generator intended for a standard therapy from 0 to 8 s using full LTSpice models of all WBG switching devices and a pre-charged capacitor Cdc = 500 µF to 2 kV. It can be observed that the desired pulse pattern with ~ 2 kV amplitude is obtained, with the source capacitor voltage falling slightly during each discharge cycle. The voltage-drop at the end of 8 bursts is seen as approximately 70 V which matches the prediction of 3.5%. Figure 11b shows an expanded waveform of one burst of 50 bipolar pulses for the duration of 0 to 200 µs. Figure 11c shows an expanded waveform of one sample bipolar pulse for the duration of 40 to 44 µs.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Output HV pulse waveforms: red trace is the terminal-voltage of the HV capacitor, blue trace is output voltage and green trace is load-current. a 8 bursts, b zoomed 1 burst, c zoomed 1 bipolar pulse

In the case of a unipolar HV electroporation pulse waveform generator, gate-pulses would be supplied only to MOSFETs S1 and S2. A logic-circuit to provide gate trigger pulses to switches S1 to S4 can be designed to generate different HV pulse parameters.

Experimental Results

The first converter stage, i.e. PT-based capacitor charger circuit has been built to verify it experimentally, using low-cost easily available commercial components as shown in Table 3. A discharge resistor of 100 MΩ is used. To maintain the output voltage within the range of available measurement equipment, the circuit has been tested at an input voltage of 2.5 Vdc at different frequencies to compare with trends predicted in simulations.

Table 3.

Key hardware components

Component Device
MOSFETs, T1 to T4

IRF540, Vishay/Siliconix

100 V, 20A, N-channel

Gate Drivers IR2184PBF, Infineon
Series Inductor, Lf DR0810-393L, Coilcraft
PT ELM-610, Eleceram
HV diodes, D1 to D4

HV5, 5 kV, 0.2A, DO-5

Diotec Semiconductor

Load capacitor, Cdc

1uF, 3 kV, WIMA

MKP1W041007K00KSSD

Figure 12 shows the measured input to the PT at 53 kHz and output voltage waveforms measured directly across the load capacitor Cdc using two HV probes (HV250: Oscilloscope Probe, Passive, 300 MHz, 2.5 kV, 100:1) for three different frequencies. Summary results are presented in Table 4. It can be observed from the measured output voltage waveforms, that the DC link capacitor Cdc is successfully charged to different voltages depending upon the operating frequency and overall voltage gain of the circuit. As predicted in simulations, there is an optimum frequency at which the fastest charging performance and highest voltage gain is found; i.e. 52 kHz in this case which is between the SC and OC resonant frequencies discussed earlier.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Experimental waveforms of a PT input voltage (VPTIN) at the end of the charging cycle and bd voltage across load-capacitor (VCDC) during charging at given frequency

Table 4.

Summary of the experimental results for the input voltage of 2.5 Vdc at different operating frequency

Frequency (kHz) Output voltage (V) Charging time (s) Charging time to 300 V (s)
52 1900 20 0.70
52.5 1460 25 0.75
53 760 25 1.4

Figure 13 shows simulation results of the same circuit at 2.5 Vdc at 53 kHz for 3 s, which is the longest time possible with available computing resources. It is found that the capacitor is charged to 350 V at this time, which compares with 450 V in measurements. To compare with the trends predicted in the simulation results of Table 2, measured results of charging time to 300 V are included in Table 4. An overall increase in charging time with frequency is observed that approximately doubles from 52 to 53 kHz, similar to trends found in simulations from 52.5 to 53.5 kHz.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Simulated output voltage during charging at 53 kHz

While there is a mismatch between simulation and measurement results, the overall charging characteristic is confirmed, and the trends of increasing charging time with operating frequency around the PT resonant frequency match. The mismatch is likely due to the simulation model of the PT [3] which has a tolerance of ± 3% on its resonant frequency. In addition, it has previously been found that the equivalent circuit model offers higher accuracy for low impedance loads [16], while a wide range of impedances up to OC are considered here.

Discussion

This paper proposes the application of a PT-based power converter architecture to generate HV pulses for electroporation. PT-based power converters are very popular for high-gain, HV power conversion applications such as CCFL inverters for LCD backlight, laser-beam printers, ozone generation etc. Therefore, the reduction in size, weight and form-factor achieved in those applications are expected to translate to the proposed application in medical electroporation, where the additional advantage of potential elimination of magnetic components may be particularly important.

Wide-bandgap (WBG) power semiconductor devices have been applied for the PT-based HV capacitor charging and subsequent HV bipolar pulse generator at the output. LTSpice simulation results successfully demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed converter architecture to generate 2 kV, 40 A bipolar pulses with only 24 Vdc input. The ratio of output pulse-voltage amplitude to input DC voltage is around 84, which is comparable to recently demonstrated power converter architectures for medical electroporation in the literature.

The experimental results of a PT-based capacitor charger demonstrate the proof-of-concept of circuit operation of Stage I. A complete hardware implementation of the whole power converter that includes combined operation of Stage I and Stage II with a closed loop control is under development.

The proposed architecture employs a reduced number of semiconductor switches thereby offering improved reliability and reduced cost. It also offers the potential to provide a magnetic-free solution, which may be important in biomedical environments where a HV pulse generator during electroporation may need to operate under the influence of external magnetic fields such as in real-time magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) [18, 19] for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation.

The PT employed is not custom designed or optimized for this new application and if done so, better performance metrics are expected.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This study was supported by the College of Science and Engineering, University of Galway (Grant No. Hardiman PhD Scholarship - 2019).

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Abadi MRQR, Marzebali MH, Abolghasemi V, Anisi MH. High-voltage pulse generators for electroporation applications: a systematic review. IEEE Access. 2022;10:64933–64951. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3184015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andersen, T., M. S. Rødgaard, M. A. Andersen, O. C. Thomsen, K. Lorenzen, C. Mangeot, A. Steenstrup. Integrated high voltage power supply utilizing burst mode control and its performance impact on dielectric electro active polymer actuators. In 13th International Conference on New Actuators and 7th International Exhibition on Smart Actuators and Drive Systems, January 2012.
  • 3.Andersen, T., M. A. E. Andersen, and O. C. Thomsen. Simulation of piezoelectric transformers with COMSOL. In COMSOL Conference, 2012.
  • 4.Ben-Yaakov S, Peretz MM. Cold cathode fluorescent lamps driven by piezoelectric transformers: stability conditions and thermal effect. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2007;22(3):761–768. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2007.896446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Butkus P, Murauskas A, Tolvaišienė S, Novickij V. Concepts and capabilities of in-house built nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) generators for electroporation: state of art. MDPI J. Appl. Sci. 2020;10(12):4244. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campana LG, Cesari M, Dughiero F, Forzan M, Rastrelli M, Rossi CR, Sieni E, Tosi AL. Electrical resistance of human soft tissue sarcomas: an ex vivo study on surgical specimens. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2016;54(5):773–787. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1368-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Canacsinh H, Redondo LM, Silva JF. Marx-type solid-state bipolar modulator topologies: performance comparison. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2012;40(10):2603–2610. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2012.2190944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Canacsinh H, Silva JF, Redondo LM. Dual resonant voltage droop compensation for bipolar solid-state Marx generator topologies. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2019;47(1):1017–1023. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2018.2868495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Carazo AV. Piezoelectric transformers: an historical review. Actuators. 2016;5(2):12. doi: 10.3390/act5020012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choi, S., T. Kim, and B. H. Cho. Design of half-bridge piezo-transformer converters in the AC adapter applications. In 20th IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, pp. 244–248, 2005.
  • 11.Chole, A. M., and B. G. Fernandes. Performance study on smart piezoelectric transformers. In 2nd International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (ICPESA’06, Hong-Kong), pp. 283–286, November 2006.
  • 12.Delshad MR, Rezanejad M, Sheikholeslami A. A new modular bipolar high-voltage pulse generator. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017;64(2):1195–1203. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2611460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.ELM-610 Datasheet. 6W Multi-Layer Piezoelectric Transformer. Taoyuan: Eleceram Technology Limited.
  • 14.Gholamalitabar H, Adabi J, Rezanejad M. A modular step-up high-voltage bipolar pulse generator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2019;47(5):2736–2741. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2019.2910022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hanisch, T., I. Kartashev, H. Guldner, and K. Lehnert. Nonpermanent excitation of piezoelectric transformers. In VIII IEEE International Power Electronics Congress, 2002. Technical Proceedings, CIEP 2002, Guadalajara, Mexico, pp. 239–244, 2002.
  • 16.Hemsel, T., W. Littmann, and J. Wallaschek. Piezoelectric transformers—state of the art and development trends. In 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings, Munich, Germany, vol. 1, pp. 645–648, 2002.
  • 17.Jeong HS, Choi BC, Yoo JH, Im IH, Park CY. Parallel driving of piezoelectric transformers. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1999;38(9R):5166–5169. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.38.5166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kranjc M, Bajd F, Serša I, Miklavčič D. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation. Physiol. Meas. 2014;35(6):985. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/6/985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kranjc M, Bajd F, Serša I, de Boevere M, Miklavčič D. Electric field distribution in relation to cell membrane electroporation in potato tuber tissue studied by magnetic resonance techniques. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016;37:384–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin, C. H., and Y. C. Chen. Design of class E backlight module incorporating piezoelectric transformer. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Kobe, Japan, vol. 4, pp. 3655–3659, 2005.
  • 21.Manh, C. D., T. Hanisch, and H. Gueldner. High voltage igniter based on discontinuous working mode of piezoelectric transformers. In 2005 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Dresden, Germany, p. 7, 2005.
  • 22.Nguyen M. -K., F. Zare, and N. Ghasemi. Switched-Capacitor-Based Nanosecond Pulse Generator Using SiC MOSFET. In 2018 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 1–6, 2018.
  • 23.Peretz, M. M., and S. Ben-Yaakov. A heuristic digital control method for optimal capacitor charging. In 2009 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp. 1118–1125, September 2009.
  • 24.Pirc E, Miklavčič D, Uršič K, Serša G, Reberšek M. High-frequency and high-voltage asymmetric bipolar pulse generator for electroporation-based technologies and therapies. Electronics. 2021;10(10):1203. doi: 10.3390/electronics10101203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ravi, V., C. Kuldip, and N. Lakshminarasamma. High voltage flyback converter for pulsed loaded applications. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Jaipur, India, pp. 1–6, 2020.
  • 26.Redondo LM, Zahyka M, Kandratsyeu A. Solid-state generation of high-frequency burst of bipolar pulses for medical applications. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2019;47(8):4091–4095. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2019.2923570. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Redondo LM, Canacsinh H, Silva JF. Generalized solid-state Marx modulator topology. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insulation. 2009;16(4):1037–1042. doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2009.5211851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Redondo LM. A DC voltage-multiplier circuit working as a high voltage pulse generator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2010;38(10):2725–2729. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2010.2050495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Redondo LM, Silva JF. Flyback versus forward switching power supply topologies for unipolar pulsed-power applications. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2009;37(1):171–178. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2008.2006056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rezanejad M, Sheikholeslami A, Adabi J. High-voltage modular switched capacitor pulsed power generator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2014;42(5):1373–1379. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2014.2312850. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rodgaard, M. S., T. Andersen, K. S. Meyer, and M. A. E. Andersen. Design of interleaved multilayer Rosen type piezoelectric transformer for high voltage DC/DC applications. In IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2012), March 2012.
  • 32.Sakamoto T, Nami A, Akiyama M, Akiyama H. A repetitive solid-state Marx-type pulsed power generator using multistage switch-capacitor cells. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2012;40(10):2316–2321. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2012.2184776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Satoshi, N., T. Ninomiya, H. Ogasawara, and H. Kakehashi. Piezoelectric-transformer inverter with maximum-efficiency tracking and dimming control. In IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, vol. 2. pp. 918–923, 2002.
  • 34.Schmitt MA, Friedrich O, Gilbert DF. Portoporator©: a portable low-cost electroporation device for gene transfer to cultured cells in biotechnology, biomedical research and education. Elsevier J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019;131:95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shi H, Lu Y, Gu T, Qiu J, Liu K. High-voltage pulse waveform modulator based on solid-state Marx generator. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insulation. 2015;22(4):1983–1990. doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2015.004959. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shoyama M., K. Horikoshi, T. Ninomiya, and T. Zaitsu. Sready-state characteristics of the push-pull piezoelectric inverter. In 28th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC), vol. 1, pp. 715–721, 1997.
  • 37.Taherian M, Roshan S, Allahbakhshi M, Farjah E, Ghanbari T. A modular unipolar/bipolar high-voltage pulse generator suitable for high resistive load. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2023;51(5):1279–1289. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2023.3262153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.UCC3976/7 Dual Evaluation Module. User Guide, Texas Instruments Inc., 2001.
  • 39.Uhen, D.A. Apparatus for electroporation. US Patent No. US6103084A, Eppendorf Netheler Hinz GmbH, Germany, August 2000.
  • 40.Valenta, P., V. Koucký, and J. Hammerbauer. Rectifiers for piezoelectric transformers. In 29th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), Belgrade, Serbia, pp.1–4, 2021.
  • 41.Xiao H, Du Y, Bai C, Guo Z, Yen KK. Design of a high-voltage piezoelectric converter for airbag ignition modules. J. Power Electron. 2014;14(1):183–193. doi: 10.6113/JPE.2014.14.1.183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Biomedical Engineering are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES