Table 2.
Body composition evaluation methods
| Ability to assess FM and FFM | Ability to assess fat regional distribution | Precision and accuracy in measuring VAT | Use of ionizing radiation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circumferences | Yes | Yes | Low | No |
| Skinfold thickness | Yes | Yes | Low | No |
| Ultrasound | No | Yes | Low | No |
| Hydrostatic weighing densitometry | Yes | No | High | No |
| Air displacement plethysmography | Yes | No | High | No |
| Bioelectrical impedance analysis | Yes | No | Medium | No |
| Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry | Yes | Partially | High | Yes |
| Computed Tomography | Yes | Yes | Gold standard | Yes |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Yes | Yes | Gold standard | No |
Most used methods to evaluate body composition
FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; VAT, visceral adipose tissue