Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 23;103(1):227–239. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05512-y

Table 2.

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of adult male lymphoma survivors according to testosterone group, with subdivisions according to the availability of two sample, at diagnosis and follow-up [3]

Survivors with “Low normal TT” (extended hormonal assessment)
N 60
Survivors with “High normal TT” (no extended hormonal analysis)
N 83
20 survivors with two samples (cryopreservation at diagnosis + VitalityCheck) 40 with one sample (VitalityCheck) 30 survivors with two samples (cryopreservation at diagnosis + VitalityObs) 53 with one sample (VitalityObs)
Diagnosis FU2 FU2 Diagnosis FU1 FU1
Median (perc) Median (perc) % change (CI) Median (perc) Mean diff between FU2 (CI) Median (perc) Median (perc) % change (CI) Median (perc) Mean diff between FU1 (CI)
Age, years 28.0 (21.0–36.5) 37.5 (27.9–49.6) 55.0 (30.0–66.0) 15.9* (9.5–19.1) 26.0 (19.0–40.5) 33.0 (26.5–48.1) 55.0 (31.6–64.4) 16.6* (12.7–20.6)
Follow-up, years 9.5 (6.0–14.0) 6.5 (4.0–11.0) 1.3* (1.5–4.3) 8.0 (4.0–13.0) 6.0 (3.0–11.0) 1.3 (− 0.2–2.6)
Treatment, N (%)a
ABVD p < 0.002* p = 0.02*
BEACOPP
CHOP
N of cycles
ABVD 6.0 4.0 p = 0.17 5.0 4.0 p = 0.02*
BEACOPP 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0
CHOP 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
TT, IA, nmol/l 14.2 (8.1–21.3) 10.6 (8.3–14.6) 21.1%↓* (5.2–34.3) 10.4 (6.8–16.3) 0.4 (− 1.0–1.9) 15.4 (11.3–28.9) 18.0 (15.0–25.6) 22.6%↑* (1.6–47.9) 19.0 (15.0–25.0) 0.4 (− 2.0–1.2)

N, number; FU1, at VitalityObs; FU2, at VitalityCheck; TT, total testosterone; FT, free testosterone, SHBG, sexual hormone binding globulin; LH, luteinizing hormone; CI, 5–95% confidence interval; perc, 5–95% percentiles; FU1, follow-up 1; FU2, follow-up 2; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; ABVD, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; BEACOPP, bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone.

See earlier published data for full overview of treatment regimens [3]

aAll treated with ABVD and BEACOPP were HL survivors; all treated with R-CHOP was DLBCL survivors.

*Statistically significant changes and differences.