Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 23;103(1):227–239. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05512-y

Table 3.

Hormonal analyses of adult male lymphoma survivors according to testosterone group, with subdivisions according to the availability of two sample, at diagnosis and follow-up

Survivors with “low normal TT” (extended hormonal assessment)
N 60
Survivors with “high normal TT” (no extended hormonal analysis)
N 83
20 survivors with two samples (cryopreservation at diagnosis + VitalityCheck) 40 with one sample (VitalityCheck) 30 survivors with two samples (cryopreservation at diagnosis + VitalityObs)
Diagnosis FU2 FU2 Diagnosis
Median (perc) Median (perc) % change Median (perc) % difference between FU2-20 to FU-40* Median (perc) % difference between diagnosis samples
TT, IA, nmol/l 14.2 (8.1–21.3) 10.6 (8.3–14.6) 21.1%↓* (5.2–34.3) 10.4 (6.8–16.3) 5.1%↓ (− 4.7–19.8) 15.4 (11.3–28.9) 10.5% (− 12.6–39.7)
cFT, IA, pmol/l 339 (202–516) 279 (171–368) 21.1%↓* (5.2–34.3) 208 (136–323) 19.1%↓* (4.3–31.3) 350 (196–596) 1.4% (− 20.2–28.9)
SHBG, nmol/l 24.5 (13.9–35.2) 22.2 (15.5–35.4) 4.4%↓ (− 18.2–11.6) 30.3 (18.4–52.5) 34.4%↑* (10.6–63.3) 30.0 (17.8–51.6) 23.4%* (0.4–51.8)
LH, IU/l 5.6 (2.1–9.6) 4.4 (2.0–10.7) 13.4%↓ (− 38.2–21.5) 4.2 (2.3–9.5) 3.9%↑ (− 23.4–40.9) 3.9 (1.9–7.3) 22.7% (− 40.6–0.7)
TT/LH ratio 2.7 (1.2–5.3) 2.8 (1.3–4.5) 11.1%↓ (− 39.8–31.4) 2.3 (1.0–5.2) 10.8%↑ (− 33.1–18.8) 4.4 (1.6) 1.35 (0.46) 42.9%* (3.9–96.7)
cFT/LH ratio 0.06 (0.03–0.16) 0.07 (0.03–0.11) 4.2%↓ (− 41.0–34.2) 0.05 (0.02–0.11) 24.9%↑ (− 45.4–3.3) 0.09 (0.05–0.14) 34.1% (− 2.1–83.5)

N, number; FU1, at VitalityObs; FU2, at VitalityCheck; TT, total testosterone; FT, free testosterone; SHBG, sexual hormone binding globulin; LH, luteinizing hormone; CI, confidence interval; FU2, follow-up 2.

*Significant changes and differences.