Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 2;8:2. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00396-z

Table 4.

Performance of T1-CE model and multi-sequence model on differentiating EGFR 19Del, 21L858R, and WT EGFR in two wises

Lesion-wise Patient-wise
Sequence 19Del 21L858R WT Overall accuracy 19Del 21L858R WT Overall accuracy
Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC Accuracy AUC
T1-CE 0.844 ± 0.033 0.822 ± 0.047 0.845 ± 0.032 0.839 ± 0.036 0.936 ± 0.021 0.895 ± 0.029 0.813 ± 0.036 0.861 ± 0.063 0.803 ± 0.090 0.828 ± 0.072 0.853 ± 0.063 0.966 ± 0.034 0.917 ± 0.048 0.828 ± 0.072
All 0.877 ± 0.029 0.996 ± 0.004 0.901 ± 0.028 0.971 ± 0.013 0.859 ± 0.031 1.000 ± 0.000 0.818 ± 0.035 0.899 ± 0.050 1.000 ± 0.000 0.941 ± 0.042 0.991 ± 0.009 0.908 ± 0.504 1.000 ± 0.000 0.874 ± 0.059

Data are given as point estimation ± halfwidth of the 95% confidence interval. 19 Del 19 deletion, 21L858R 21-point mutation, AUC Area under the curve, EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor, T1-CE T1-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging sequence, WT Wild-type