Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 2;14:172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50379-8

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazard analysis for risk factors of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness.

Covariate Bivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR [95% CI] p value HR [95% CI] p value
Previous bDMARDs (number) 1.18 [1.07–1.31] 0.001 1.11 [0.97–1.26] 0.125
CDAI 1.03 [1.00–1.05] 0.023 1.02 [0.99–1.05] 0.121
Previous JAK inhibitors (number) 1.48 [1.05–2.07] 0.025 1.20 [0.79–1.83] 0.381
Concomitant GC 1.68 [0.96–2.94] 0.072 1.43 [0.80–2.56] 0.223
Concomitant csDMARDs 0.64 [0.34–1.19] 0.158
RA disease duration (years) 0.98 [0.96–1.01] 0.163
RF (positivity) 0.71 [0.42–1.21] 0.210
Age (years) 0.81 [0.48–1.38] 0.437
Anti-CCP (positivity) 0.89 [0.48–1.66] 0.720
Sex (female) 1.08 [0.53–2.21] 0.826

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, bDMARDs biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, CDAI clinical disease activity index, JAK Janus Kinase, GC glucocorticoids, csDMARDs conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, RA rheumatoid arthritis, RF rheumatoid factor, anti-CCP anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides.

All covariates that were statistically significant (P < 0.05) or exhibited borderline significance (P < 0.1 and > 0.05) in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.