. 2023 Dec 11;10(1):e23581. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23581

Table 1.

Effect of SN on wound area and wound closure % in rats at different periods after skin injury.

Clusters	Wound area mm²		Day 5 Closure %	Wound area mm²	Day 10 Closure %	Wound area mm²	Day 15 Closure %
Clusters	Day 0	Day 5	Day 5 Closure %	Day 10	Day 10 Closure %	Day 15	Day 15 Closure %
A	235 ± 0.56	163.5 ± 3.2^c	30.42	93.44 ± 0.34	60.23^b	47.52 ± 1.8^c	79.77^b
B	235 ± 0.46	90.32 ± 2.43^a	61.56	38.54 ± 1.8^a	83.60^a	13.42 ± 1.4^a	94.28^a
C	235 ± 0.44	94.5 ± 2.32^b	59.78	48.20 ± 2.2^b	79.48^a	23.65 ± 1.2^b	89.93^a
D	235 ± 0.66	92.43 ± 2.24^b	60.66	41.20 ± 2.3^b	82.46^a	16.4 ± 0.78^a	93.02^a

Data are shown as Mean values ± SEM (n = 6). Different letters on values within the same column were statistically significant at P < 0.05. A, Vehicle rats had Gum acacia solution; B, rats received Intrasite gel (reference); C, rats received topically 0.2 ml of 30 mg/ml of SN on their wound area; D, rats treated with 0.2 ml of 300 mg/ml of SN.