Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 2;15:41. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44309-5

Table 3.

Efficacy analysis in the modified intention-to-treat population

Variable CA-SAP group (n = 51) SAP group (n = 53) P value FDR-adjusted P value
Pathological response
TRG 0 (Complete) 8 (15.7) 3 (5.7)
TRG 1 (Subtotal) 9 (17.6) 6 (11.3)
TRG 2 (Partial) 10 (19.6) 21 (39.6)
TRG 3 (Minimal or none) 22 (43.1) 19 (35.8)
No gastrectomy 2 (3.9) 4 (7.5)
Major pathological response rate (%, 95% CI) 33.3 (19.9–46.7) 17.0 (6.5–27.4) 0.044 0.080
Complete response rate (%, 95% CI) 15.7 (5.4–26.0) 5.7 (0–12.1) 0.089 0.118
Radiologic response
CR 3 (5.9) 0 (0.0)
PR 30 (58.8) 23 (43.4)
SD 16 (31.4) 28 (52.8)
PD 1 (2.0) 2 (3.7)
Unidentified 1 (2.0) 0 (0.0)
Objective response rate (%, 95% CI) 66.0 (52.4–79.6) 43.4 (29.2–57.6) 0.017 0.080
Disease control rate (%, 95% CI) 96.1 (90.6–100) 96.2 (90.0–100) 0.677 0.677
Tumor downstaging
cT stage Pre-treatment Post-treatment Pre-treatment Post-treatment
T1 0 (0.0) 1 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
T2 0 (0.0) 10 (19.6) 0 (0.0) 5 (9.4)
T3 5 (9.8) 17 (33.3) 8 (15.1) 19 (35.8)
T4 46 (90.2) 22 (43.1) 45 (84.9) 29 (54.7)
Unidentified 0 (0.0) 1 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
T downstaging (%) 27 (52.9) 17 (32.1) 0.025 0.080
cN stage Pre-treatment Post-treatment Pre-treatment Post-treatment
N0 0 (0.0) 13 (25.5) 0 (0.0) 9 (17.0)
N+ 51 (100.0) 36 (70.6) 53 (100.0) 44 (83.0)
Unidentified 0 (0.0) 1 (2.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
N downstaging (%) 13 (25.5) 9 (17.0) 0.206 0.229
Surgical Fingdings
R0 resection rate (%, 95% CI) 94.1 (87.4–100) 81.1 (70.2–92.0) 0.042 0.080

Data are No. (%). Because of rounding, not all percentages add up to 100%. P values were one-sided for efficacy analyses in Fisher’s exact test and adjusted by controlling for the false discovery rate (FDR) using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure.

CA-SAP camrelizumab, apatinib, nab-paclitaxel, and S-1, SAP nab-paclitaxel and S-1, TRG tumor regression grade, CI confidence interval, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease.