Table 4. CASP checklist to assess the quality of studies.

The asterisk sign (*) indicates ‘yes.’

Cont.	Xie, et al. 2016 [10]	Maideen, et al.  2023 [29]	Ikuta, et al. 2022 [30]	Zhang, et al. 2021 [31]	Wu, et al. 2023 [32]	Chen, et al. 2022 [33]	Wakabayashi, et al. 2021 [34]
Did the review address a focused question?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Did the authors look for the correct types of papers?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Do you think all the essential, relevant studies were included?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Did the review’s authors do enough to assess the quality of the included studies?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
If the review results have been combined, was it reasonable to do so?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
What are the overall results of the review?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
How precise are the results?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Can the results be applied to the local population?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Were all important outcomes considered?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Are the benefits worth the harm and costs?	*	*	*	*	*	*	*
Results	Good	Fair	Good	Good	Good	Good	Good