Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 9;23:278–286. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.008

Table 1.

Summary of interface composition and binding free energy calculations of the most stable complex models.

Complex
(Subject-Partner)
Model Interface composition
Binding free
energy (kcal/mol)
Subject (left) Partner (right)
ADORA1-ADORA1 Noncry TM3 (E) Identical 9.15 ± 0.24
ADORA1-Iso_3TM CP-6 TM4, TM2 (E), TM3 (E) TM2, TM1, TM3 (E) -133.94 ± 0.25
ADORA1-Iso_4TM AF-1 TM1, TM3 (E), TM4 (I) TM4 -111.64 ± 0.18
AF-3 TM1, TM2 TM4 -115.60 ± 0.39
mGlu2-mGlu2 Inactive TM4, TM3(E) Identical -61.06 ± 0.35
Active TM6, TM7 (E) Identical -43.55 ± 0.13
mGlu2-Iso_2TM LD-15 TM4, TM2, TM3 (E) TM7, TM6 -163.79 ± 0.26
CP-H10 TM7, TM6, TM1 TM6, TM7 -192.07 ± 0.32
SMO-SMO TM4, TM5 Identical -69.66 ± 0.13
SMO-Iso_3TM LD-34 TM4, TM5 TM4, TM5 -95.90 ± 0.34

Note: The content of “Interface composition” is ordered by the contribution to the interface formation and only TM helices are shown. For example, “TM7, TM1, TM6” indicates TM7 > TM1 > TM6 in terms of contact contribution. E, the extracellular side-facing part of the helix; M, the middle part of the helix; I, the intracellular side-facing part of the helix. No parenthesis indicates that the majority of this helix is involved in the interface composition. “AF-1” denotes the Rank 1 model generated by AlphaFold-Multimer; “LD-12” denotes the No.12 model generated by LightDock; “CP-12” denotes the No.12 model generated by ClusPro with the default Balanced mode, and “CP-H12” denotes the No.12 model generated by ClusPro with the Hydrophobic-favored mode. Isoforms are displayed in the abbreviated forms without the prefix. For example, “mGlu2-Iso_2TM” denotes the complex formed by mGlu2 and its truncated isoform with two transmembrane helices. The numbering of transmembrane helices in truncated isoforms corresponds to their numbering in the full-length counterparts. Binding free energy values are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).