Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 3;23:3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01327-w

Table 2.

Assessment of articles included in the review

Authors/ Year Abstract and title Introduction and aims Method and data Sampling Data analysis Ethics and bias Results Transferability generalizability Implications usefulness Total Average Grade
Wang et al. 2021 [36] 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 33 3.6 Good
Cohen et al. 2021 [37] 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 27 3 Good
Berkowitz et al. 2021 [38] 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 32 3.5 Good
Bar-Sela et al. 2021 [39] 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 31 3.4 Good
Rodenbach et al. 2020 [40] 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 34 3.7 Good
Brown et al. 2016 [19] 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 32 3.5 Good
Kish et al. 2000 [41] 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 27 3 Good
Dow et al. 2010 [42] 4 4 2 2 4 3 2 3 3 27 3 Good
Kubi et al. 2020 [43] 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 32 3.5 Good
Saeed et al. 2019 [44] 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 29 3.2 Good
Prater et al. 2019 [45] 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 32 3.5 Good
Bires et al. 2018 [46] 3 3 4 2 3 3 3 3 4 27 3 Good
McDonald et al. 2017 [31] 4 4 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 30 3.3 Good
Kim et al. 2017 [47] 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 4 30 3.3 Good
Zheng et al. 2016 [13] 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 29 3.2 Good
Tan and Jatoiet al. 2008 [48] 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 34 3.7 Good
True et al. 2005 [49] 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 31 3.4 Good
Seifart et al. 2020 [50] 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 31 3.4 Good
Zaros et al. 2013 [51] 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 27 3 Good
Wallace et al. 2001 [52] 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 32 3.5 Good
Lin et al. 2019 [53] 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 28 3.1 Good
Sudore et al. 2018 [54] 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 36 4 Good
Total 3.7 3.6 3.1 3 3.3 3.1 3.5 3.4 3.5 30.2 3 Good