Table 7.

Results of multiple regression analysis of concerns about COVID-19 (continued)

Independent variables (Ref)	Overall concerns			Direct concerns			Indirect concerns
Independent variables (Ref)	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Hypertension (No)
Yes		0.02 (.00)^***	0.03 (.00)^***		0.04 (.01)^***	0.04 (.01)^***		0.01 (.00)^*	0.01 (.00)^**
Diabetes (No)
Yes		0.03 (.01)^***	0.04 (.01)^***		0.06 (.01)^***	0.07 (.01)^***		0.01 (.01)^*	0.02 (.01)^**
Unmet healthcare needs (n/a)
No		0.12 (.01)^***	0.10 (.01)^***		0.13 (.01)^***	0.12 (.01)^***		0.10 (.01)^***	0.09 (.01)^***
Yes		0.11 (.01)^***	0.10 (.01)^***		0.09 (.01)^***	0.07 (.01)^***		0.13 (.01)^***	0.11 (.01)^***
Daily life changes (Mild or none)
Moderate			0.16 (.00)^***			0.16 (.00)^***			0.17 (.00)^***
Severe			0.28 (.00)^***			0.27 (.01)^***			0.29 (.00)^***
Numbers of assistants during quarantine (≥ 6)
3–5			0.06 (.01)^***			0.06 (.01)^***			0.05 (.01)^***
1–2			0.13 (.01)^***			0.15 (.01)^***			0.11 (.01)^***
None			0.13 (.01)^***			0.15 (.01)^***			0.11 (.01)^***
Appropriateness of the government’s response (Good)
Fair			-0.03 (.01)^***			-0.02 (.01)^***			-0.03 (.01)^***
Poor			-0.04 (.01)^***			-0.05 (.01)^***			-0.03 (.01)^***
Appropriateness of the city’s response (Good)
Fair			-0.04 (.01)^***			-0.04 (.01)^***			-0.03 (.01)^***
Poor			0.01 (.01)			-0.01 (.01)			0.02 (.01)^*
Appropriateness of media’s response (Good)
Fair			-0.08 (.00)^***			-0.10 (.01)^***			-0.07 (.00)^***
Poor			-0.16 (.01)^***			-0.22 (.01)^***			-0.12 (.01)^***
Appropriateness of neighbor’s response (Good)
Fair			-0.04 (.00)^***			-0.01 (.01)			-0.06 (.00)^***
Poor			0.03 (.01)^***			0.07 (.01)^***			0.01 (.01)

Standard errors are presented in parentheses

Model 1: Sociodemographic variables

Model 2: Sociodemographic and health-related variables

Model 3: Sociodemographic, health-related, and COVID-19 related variables

^*p < 0.5

^**p < 0.01

^***p < 0.001