Table 4.

Comparison of experimental results of MHESMMR and PSSR

Model	Dataset	Acc. (%)	Sen. (%)	Spec. (%)	MCC (%)	AUC	AUPR
BNEMDI	Dataset1	84.69 ± 2.07	86.75 ± 2.97	82.64 ± 2.43	73.29 ± 2.09	0.9237 ± 0.0364	0.9169 ± 0.0145
	Dataset2	88.83 ± 0.55	90.29 ± 1.61	87.38 ± 2.31	77.74 ± 1.83	0.9478 ± 0.0045	0.9397 ± 0.0051
GCLAMS	Dataset1	80.37 ± 2.24	90.70 ± 2.28	76.09 ± 3.42	67.52 ± 4.37	0.8688 ± 0.2143	0.8581 ± 0.2325
	Dataset2	87.36 ± 2.52	86.36 ± 0.66	69.29 ± 3.81	69.37 ± 2.58	0.9164 ± 0.3548	0.9027 ± 0.1429
ELDMA	Dataset1	87.63 ± 2.08	88.84 ± 1.47	86.01 ± 3.46	74.91 ± 4.12	0.9447 ± 0.0015	0.9444 ± 0.1236
	Dataset2	88.93 ± 0.74	91.31 ± 1.68	86.57 ± 1.93	77.99 ± 1.45	0.9558 ± 0.3484	0.9485 ± 0.7123
PSRR	Dataset1	79.59 ± 1.67	78.47 ± 2.32	80.7 ± 2.43	59.22 ± 3.33	0.8689 ± 0.0134	0.8583 ± 0.0125
	Dataset2	80.37 ± 1.54	78.32 ± 1.94	82.4 ± 3.63	60.84 ± 3.21	0.8765 ± 0.0135	0.8722 ± 0.0133
MHESMMR	Dataset1	90.55 ± 0.91	92.73 ± 1.65	88.38 ± 2.03	81.21 ± 1.80	0.9594 ± 0.0065	0.9611 ± 0.0046
	Dataset2	90.97 ± 1.51	92.74 ± 1.76	89.21 ± 3.25	82.05 ± 2.94	0.9620 ± 0.0099	0.9649 ± 0.0062