Table 2.
Access to health services factors associated with results for Syphilis among riverine, in the Brazilian Amazon. 2020–2021
| Access to health services | Rapid test – T. pallidum | Total n (%) | Binary Regression | Multiple regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-reactive n (%) | Reactive n (%) | OR (95% CI) | p | aOR (95% CI) | p | ||
| Performed rapid test for STI (ever in life) | |||||||
| No | 140(95.9) | 6(4.1) | 146(46.9) | 0.60 (0.21; 1.66) | 0.45 | ||
| Yes | 154(93.3) | 11(6.7) | 165(53.1) | Ref | |||
| NIa | 12 | 2 | 14 | ||||
| Performed rapid test for STI (last 12 months) | |||||||
| No | 215(95.1) | 11(4.9) | 226(72.9) | 0.66 (0.23; 1.85) | 0.61 | ||
| Yes | 78(92.9) | 6(7.1) | 84(27.1) | Ref | |||
| NIa | 13 | 2 | 15 | ||||
| Access to condoms (12 months) | |||||||
| No | 133 (93.7) | 9 (6.3) | 142 (44.5) | 1.37 (0.47; 3.97) | 0.74 | ||
| Yes, I bought it in a commercial establishment | 45 (91.8) | 4 (8.2) | 49 (15.4) | 1.80 (0.48; 6.70) | 0.59 | ||
| Yes, free in actions and in the health service | 122(95.3) | 6(4.7) | 128 (40.1) | Ref | |||
| NIa | 5 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| Access to female condom (last 6 months) | |||||||
| No | 271 (93.8) | 18 (6.2) | 289 (88.9) | 2.32 (0.30; 17.9) | 0.64 | ||
| Yes, free in the health service | 35(97.2) | 1(2.8) | 36 (11.1) | Ref | |||
| Know Post-Exposure Prophylaxis | |||||||
| No | 280(94.3) | 17(5.7) | 297(91.4) | 0.78 (0.17; 3.60) | 0.90 | ||
| Yes | 26(92.9) | 2(7.1) | 28(8.6) | Ref | |||
| Do you know female condom? | |||||||
| No | 77(89.5) | 9(10.5) | 86(26.8) | 3.44 (1.03; 11.6) | 0.06 | 0.24 | |
| Yes, professionals and/or the media | 225 | 10 | 235 | Ref | |||
| NIa | 4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
STI Sexually Transmitted Infections, OR odds ratio, CI confidence intervals, Ref. reference, aOR adjusted odds ratio
a NI: not informed/do not want/do not know—not considered for statistical calculation