Table 14. Performance comparison with previous study.
Study | Approach | Train-Test Method | 10-Fold | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | Accuracy | SD | ||
[35] | MLFS + RF | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.94 | ± 1.68 |
[19] | RF | 0.98 | N/A | N/A | 0.98 | N/A | N/A |
[49] | CNN + SGLV | 0.96 | N/A | N/A | 0.96 | N/A | N/A |
[28] | DT | 0.98 | N/A | N/A | 0.97 | N/A | N/A |
[48] | DT | 0.93 | N/A | N/A | 0.93 | N/A | N/A |
Our | Down-sampling + SSC | 0.995 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | ±0.01 |