Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 1;42(1):28–55. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01476-1

Table 4.

Summary of representative studies on 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics-based machine learning analyses in breast tumors

Authors Years Tumor type Aim Sample size Constructed ML models Core ML algorithm Best ML model Validation Resultsa
Differentiating benign from malignant tumors and predicting tumor characteristics or stage
 Eifer et al. [92] 2022 Axillary LN COVID-19 vaccine-associated lymphadenopathy vs. metastasis n = 99

CT radiomics-based model

PET radiomics-based model

Combined model

kNN Combined model Training and validation cohorts AUC: 0.98
 Chen et al. [93] 2022 Breast cancer HER2 status n = 217

CT radiomics-based model

PET radiomics-based model

PET/CTconcat radiomics-based model

PET/CTmean radiomics-based model

XGB PET/CTmean radiomics model Training and validation cohorts AUC: 0.760
 Song [94] 2021 Breast cancer LNM n = 100 PET radiomics-based model alone XGB Training and validation cohorts AUC: 0890
 Krajnc et al. [95] 2021 Breast cancer Triple negative hormone status n = 170 Combined clinical + CT radiomics-based + PET radiomics-based model alone Ensemble ML algorithm

Internal validation

(cross-validation)

AUC: 0.82
 Ou et al. [96] 2020 Breast tumor Breast cancer vs. malignant lymphoma n = 44

SUV model

CT radiomics-based model

PET radiomics-based model

Combined clinical + PET radiomics-based model

Combined clinical + CT radiomics-based model

LASSO + LDA Combined clinical and PET radiomics model Training and validation cohorts AUC: 0.806
Predicting treatment response or survival
 Li et al. [100] 2020 Breast cancer pCR after NAC n = 100

CT radiomics-based model

PET radiomics-based model

Combined age + CT radiomics-based + PET radiomics-based model

RF Combined model Training and validation cohorts Accuracy: 0.80
Gómez et al. [101] 2022 Metastatic breast cancer Metabolic response after treatment n = 48 Combined clinical + CT radiomics-based + PET radiomics-based model alone LASSO + SVM Training and validation cohorts AUC: 0.82

AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor, kNN k-nearest neighbors, LASSO least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm, LDA linear discriminant analysis, LN lymph node, LNM lymph node metastasis, ML machine learning, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pCR pathological complete response, RF random forest, SVM support vector machine, XGB gradient tree boosting

aPerformance only presents the result of the best machine learning model