TABLE 3.
Mean ranks and chi-square values for perceptual effects for descriptive priming. Omitted tests are n.s.
unsafe | middle | safe | χ2 (2) | p | perceptual effects as increased safety was primed | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed | 2.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 8.6 | .01 | (mixed) lower speed |
Weight | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 6.5 | .04 | higher weight |
Power | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 7.5 | .02 | (mixed) less power |
Safety | 1.6 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 8.3 | .012 | (mixed) more safe |
Balance | 1.6 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 12.7 | <.01 | (mixed) more balanced |
Motor power | 2.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 7.4 | .03 | (mixed) less motor power) |
Toughness* | 1.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 4.6 | .10 | tougher |
Traction* | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 4.9 | .09 | Improved traction |
Higher ranks for power, balance, toughness, and safety are considered “better” and higher ranks for speed are considered “faster”, and higher ranks for weight are considered “heavier.” (mixed) indicates that the middle condition was not the midpoint of the 3 conditions.
*marked measures are statistical trends of interest, but not significant.