Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 21;11:1281405. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281405

Table 9.

Heterogeneity analysis based on residence and urban location.

Residence Region
Rural Town East Central West
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Digital 0.8343 (1.8567) 1.4281*** (0.4721) 0.5350 (0.5213) −2.5443 (1.6538) 2.3998** (1.0284)
digital_sq −1.6821* (3.5370) −3.8253*** (1.0198) −2.1549** (1.0037) 7.4950 (4.9584) −4.3255 (3.1208)
Gender −0.1355*** (0.0409) −0.1584*** (0.0145) −0.1610*** (0.0173) −0.1200*** (0.0190) −0.1393*** (0.0209)
Education −0.0186* (0.0111) −0.0191*** (0.0045) −0.0214*** (0.0049) −0.0255*** (0.0051) −0.0409*** (0.0057)
Marital −0.0272** (0.0119) −0.0011 (0.0036) 0.0031 (0.0042) 0.0011 (0.0050) −0.0108* (0.0056)
Age 0.0169*** (0.0021) 0.0130*** (0.0008) 0.0127*** (0.0009) 0.0114*** (0.0010) 0.0138*** (0.0011)
lnGDP −0.0485* (0.0293) −0.1642*** (0.0097) −0.1326*** (0.0105) −0.1115*** (0.0160) −0.1811*** (0.0146)
Population 0.0002*** (0.0000) 0.0002*** (0.0000) 0.0002*** (0.0000) 0.0001*** (0.0000) 0.0003*** (0.0000)
Urbanization 0.3325 (0.6540) 0.0072 (0.1809) 0.3192 (0.2218) 0.7896*** (0.2496) −0.2241 (0.2343)
_cons 2.0240*** (0.4538) 3.3581*** (0.1332) 2.9741*** (0.1671) 2.9677*** (0.2254) 3.4781*** (0.1644)
N 4,061 33,574 21,430 16,940 13,691
r2_a 0.4910 0.4407 0.4000 0.3750 0.3974

Standard errors in parentheses. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.