Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 4;63(1):2301233. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01233-2023

TABLE 4.

Primary analysis of key secondary end-points

End-point Estimated difference (95% CI) (rGM-CSF versus control) # p-value #
Pulmonary gas transfer
PaO2 (mmHg) 9.5 (5.7–13.3) <0.0001
PA–aO2 (mmHg) −10.1 (−14.8– −5.4) <0.0001
DLCO (% predicted) 11.6 (1.9–21.3) 0.022
Pulmonary function
 VC (% predicted) 2.3 (−5.3–9.9) 0.532
Radiological assessment
 GGO score −0.822 (−1.7–0.01) 0.053
SF-36 general health score 4.72 (−1.88–11.33) 0.149
Serum biomarkers
 CyFra21.1 (ng·mL−1) −0.24 (−0.44– −0.04) 0.022
 CEA (ng·mL−1) −0.47 (−0.71– −0.22) 0.001
 KL-6 (U·mL−1) −3689 (−6972– −406) 0.030

rGM-CSF: recombinant granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PaO2: arterial oxygen tension; PA–aO2: alveolar–arterial oxygen tension difference; DLCO: diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; VC: (slow) vital capacity; GGO: ground glass opacification; SF-36: Short Form 36-question Health Survey; Cyfra21.1: cytokeratin-19 fragment antigen; CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen; KL-6: Krebs von den Lungen. #: after adjustment for baseline value, gender, age and the numbers of patients at risk at each point, the between-group difference (95% CI) and p-value were calculated using repeated measures ANOVA.