Abstract
Background
Redox imbalance and inflammation have been proposed as the principal mechanisms of damage in the auditory system, resulting in functional alterations and hearing loss. Microglia and astrocytes play a crucial role in mediating oxidative/inflammatory injury in the central nervous system; however, the role of glial cells in the auditory damage is still elusive.
Objectives
Here we investigated glial-mediated responses to toxic injury in peripheral and central structures of the auditory pathway, i.e., the cochlea and the auditory cortex (ACx), in rats exposed to styrene, a volatile compound with well-known oto/neurotoxic properties.
Methods
Male adult Wistar rats were treated with styrene (400 mg/kg daily for 3 weeks, 5/days a week). Electrophysiological, morphological, immunofluorescence and molecular analyses were performed in both the cochlea and the ACx to evaluate the mechanisms underlying styrene-induced oto/neurotoxicity in the auditory system.
Results
We showed that the oto/neurotoxic insult induced by styrene increases oxidative stress in both cochlea and ACx. This was associated with macrophages and glial cell activation, increased expression of inflammatory markers (i.e., pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokine receptors) and alterations in connexin (Cxs) and pannexin (Panx) expression, likely responsible for dysregulation of the microglia/astrocyte network. Specifically, we found downregulation of Cx26 and Cx30 in the cochlea, and high level of Cx43 and Panx1 in the ACx.
Conclusions
Collectively, our results provide novel evidence on the role of immune and glial cell activation in the oxidative/inflammatory damage induced by styrene in the auditory system at both peripheral and central levels, also involving alterations of gap junction networks. Our data suggest that targeting glial cells and connexin/pannexin expression might be useful to attenuate oxidative/inflammatory damage in the auditory system.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-023-02996-3.
Keywords: ROS, Pro-inflammatory cytokines, Macrophages, Microglia morphology, Astrogliosis, Gap junctions, Cochlea, Auditory cortex
Introduction
Hearing loss induced by the exposure to environmental factors, such as noise or ototoxic drugs, is primarily due to permanent alterations occurring in peripheral and central structures of the auditory pathway [1]. Indeed, hearing loss is associated with cochlear damage to hair cells, afferent neurons and synapses [2, 3] along with short- and long-term detrimental consequences in central auditory structures [4–6], with altered basal synaptic transmission and decreased spine density in the auditory cortex (ACx) [7–10]. Recent findings supported the idea that the unbalance of cellular redox status and inflammation are key mechanisms of cochlear damage. Indeed, in animal models of acquired hearing loss caused by noise exposure or ototoxic drug administration, an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS), together with an up-regulation of inflammatory mediators have been observed in the cochlea [11–13], as well as in brain regions involved in the auditory perception [10, 14].
Dysfunction of glial cells, including astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia in the central nervous system (CNS), and Schwann cells or satellite cells in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are strongly involved in damaging mechanisms depending on oxidative stress and inflammation [15–19].
Astrocytes play a crucial role in brain homeostasis, contributing to many functions, including blood–brain barrier maintenance, neurotransmitter cycling, metabolic and synaptic support [20–22]. Similarly, microglia, the resident innate immune cells in the CNS [23, 24], regulates several brain functions, such as synaptic plasticity and synaptogenesis, and shapes neuronal circuits during development [25, 26], including auditory brainstem pathways [27], and in post-natal life [28]. Among microglia general markers, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (IBA-1), cluster of differentiation receptors, such as CD68, and fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) are the most widely used, although expressed also in macrophages [20, 21, 29–31]. Whereas, largely specific microglia markers include transmembrane protein 119 (TMEM119) and purinergic receptor P2YR12 [29, 30].
Macrophages are phagocytic cells, considered the major overseers of the immune system, regulating tissue homeostasis and inflammatory responses [32–34]. They are generally classified in tissue-resident macrophages, responsible for tissue repair, homeostasis, and inhibition of inflammation [35, 36], and monocytes, recruited from the bone-marrow following an insult, promoting the inflammatory response [36–38]. Thus, in the auditory system, macrophages have been found distributed in both the peripheral organ, the cochlea (macrophages and perivascular macrophage-like melanocyte) and in the CNS (microglia and perivascular macrophages in the cerebral cortex) [38].
Different from microglia, arising from erythro-myeloid precursors in the yolk sac and, during early stages of embryonic development, migrating to the CNS [39, 40], macrophages are derived from monocytes, which originate from bone-marrow hematopoietic stem cells [41]. On a functional point of view, macrophages and microglia are both plastic, adapting their phenotype to the local tissue micro-environment by changing their morphology, abundance, and distribution in response to insults [32, 33, 38, 42, 43].
Following an injury, glial cells start modulating the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Indeed, microglia is involved in increased ROS generation in the CNS [44–46] and both microglia and astrocytes can modulate inflammatory responses through cytokines, chemokines, and oxidative stress markers [47, 48]. In this view, several studies underlined the role of gap junctions (GJCs), hemichannels (HCs) and pannexons in affecting glial cell function and dysfunction [49–53]. Microglial and astrocyte activation is a complex and dynamic process, based on molecular signaling pathways occurring through opening GJCs, HCs and pannexin (Panx) channels [52, 54, 55]. On the other hand, activated microglia affect connexin expression and GJC and HC functional activity in astrocytes [56–61].
Studies performed in different animal models reported persistent macrophages activation in the cochlea and in the auditory nuclei of brainstem, specifically the cochlear nucleus, after auditory deprivation caused by cochlear deafferentation [62–65]. However, although the contribution of microglia and astrocytes to neuroinflammatory damage has been documented in several CNS disorders, less is known about their role in the auditory system. Thus, we studied immune and glial cell responses in the auditory peripheral organ (i.e., the cochlea) and in the ACx using an experimental model of oto/neurotoxic damage caused by the administration of styrene, a volatile organic solvent with well-documented ototoxic effects at occupational level [66–69].
Here, we report that macrophages activation in the cochlea and glial cell response in the ACx play a critical role in the oxidative/inflammatory damage of the auditory system, also involving altered expression of connexins and pannexins in cochlear and brain regions.
Materials and methods
Animals
In our experimental plan, we used n = 35 male adult Wistar rats (2–3 months of age) with normal Preyer’s reflex, randomly assigned to three experimental groups: (1) control animals (“Ctrl” group; n = 14); (2) animals treated with styrene by oral gavage (“Styrene” group; n = 14) and (3) control animals that underwent oral gavage of olive oil (“Ctrl-gavage” group; n = 7). Rats were housed two per cage with free access to food (Mucedola 4RF21, Italy) and water. Housing environment was temperature (22–23 °C) and humidity (60% ± 5%) controlled, with a 12-h light/dark cycle. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and number, in agreement with the European Community Council Directive of 24 November 1986(86/609/EEC). All procedures were performed in accordance with the Laboratory of Animal Care and Use Committee of the Catholic University, School of Medicine of Rome and were approved by the Italian Department of Health (Ministero della Salute, Prot. 1F295.116 and Prot. 1F295.117). A schematic representation of the experimental plan is reported in Fig. 1. A list of abbreviations in the whole text is reported in the Additional file 1: Table S1. Experiments were performed according to the Arrive guidelines (Additional file 2).
Oto/neurotoxic insult: styrene administration
To damage the auditory system, we used styrene administration, a well-known oto/neurotoxic volatile compound. Indeed, styrene exposure has been previously shown to cause cochlear damage and hearing loss [66, 67]. Thus, styrene (styrene > 99%, Sigma Corporation, product id: S4972) was dissolved in olive oil, as reported in previous published protocols [66, 67] and administered by oral gavage for 21 days, following a dosage and time schedule of treatment previously used (400 mg/kg daily for 3 weeks, 5/days a week) [66, 67, 69]. At the end of styrene treatment, animals were sacrificed, brain and cochlear samples were collected to perform all experimental evaluations.
Auditory brainstem responses (ABR)
To evaluate cochlear damage and hearing loss we measured ABRs, as described previously [8]. Briefly, using active, reference and ground needle electrodes (inserted subcutaneously in tested pinna, vertex, and contralateral pinna, respectively), we recorded auditory bioelectrical potentials in animals mildly anesthetized (ketamine, 35 mg/kg and medetomidine-domitor, 0.25 mg/kg) subjected to acoustic click stimuli at decreasing intensity levels (from 100 to 10 dB). Data were collected and analyzed using a TDT System 3 (Tucker Davis Technologies, Alachua, FL, United States).
The lower stimulus intensity able to evoke a repeatable ABR waveform was considered as the auditory threshold. We also measured the wave II amplitude–intensity (A–I) curve from ABR recordings as previously reported [7, 70].
Ex vivo electrophysiology
We performed field recordings on coronal slices (400 μm-thick) containing the ACx as previously described [8–10]. FEPSPs were evoked in pyramidal neurons of layer II/III of the ACx by stimulating local connections using a concentric bipolar tungsten electrode (FHC Inc., Bowdoin, ME, USA) connected to a stimulator. I/O curves were obtained by afferent fiber stimulation at intensities ranging from 0 to 300 µA (in increments of 50 µA; stimulus rate of 1 pulse every 20 s).
Tissue section preparation and immunofluorescence staining
Immunofluorescence experiments were performed in both cochlear and ACx samples.
In cochlear specimens, we performed immunofluorescence analyses in both cryosections (obtained as described in [66]) and in surface preparations of the basilar membrane with the organ of Corti, obtained through cochlear microdissection as described previously [7, 8].
To perform analyses in the ACx we used 40-μm-thick coronal brain cryosections, collected from 2.18 mm to 3.4 mm posterior to bregma [71], containing the ACx [8, 10]. Cochlear surface preparations/sections or brain sections containing ACx were incubated with a blocking solution (containing 1% BSA, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 10% normal goat serum in PBS 0.1 M) and then they were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a solution containing primary antibodies against: IBA-1, GFAP, COX-2, CtBP2, NF200, CD68. All specimens were incubated at room temperature (RT) for 2 h with donkey anti-rabbit and/or anti-mouse secondary antibody solution (Alexa Fluor 488 or 546) and DAPI stained to visualize cell nuclei. Detailed information about the antibodies is reported in Table 1.
Table 1.
Reagent type | Designation | Source | Identifiers | Additional information | Use |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antibody | Anti-IBA-1(rabbit monoclonal) | Cell signaling | Cat. No. #17198 | IF (1:100) | Marker of microglia/macrophages |
Antibody |
Anti-rabbit IgG AlexaFluor 546 (rabbit polyclonal) |
Thermo fisher scientific | Cat. No. #A-10040 | IF (1:400) | Secondary antibody for immunofluorescence analyses |
Antibody |
Anti-rabbit IgG AlexaFluor 488 (rabbit polyclonal) |
Thermo fisher scientific | Cat.No. #A-21206 | IF (1:400) | Secondary antibody for immunofluorescence analyses |
Antibody |
Anti-mouse IgG AlexaFluor 546 (mouse polyclonal) |
Thermo fisher scientific | Cat.No. #A10036 | IF (1:400) | Secondary antibody for immunofluorescence analyses |
Nuclear Counterstains | DAPI | Thermo fisher scientific | Cat.No. D1306 | IF (0.5 mg/mL) | Marker of cell nuclei |
Antibody | Anti-GFAP (mouse monoclonal) | Cell signaling | Cat. No. #3670 |
IF (1:300) WB (1:1000) |
Marker of glial fibrillary acidic protein (glial cells and astrocytes) |
Antibody | Anti-COX-2 (rabbit monoclonal) | Cell signaling | Cat. No. #12282 |
IF (1:500) WB (1:1000) |
Marker of cyclooxygenase2 protein (inflammatory marker) |
Antibody | Anti-CtBP2 (mouse) | BD biosciences | Cat. No. 612044 | IF (1:1000) | Marker of C-terminal-binding protein 2 (pre-synaptic contact) |
Antibody | Anti-NF200 (rabbit polyclonal) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat. No. N4142 | IF (1:80) | Marker of neurofilaments (afferent fibers) |
Antibody | Anti-CD68 (mouse monoclonal) | Abcam | Cat. No. ab955 |
WB (1:1000) IF (1:100) |
Phagocytic markers involved in microglia and macrophages activation |
Antibody | Anti-cleaved-caspase 3 (rabbit polyclonal) | Millipore | Cat. No. #AB3623 | WB (1:100) | Marker of cleaved-caspase-3 protein (active form in apoptotic pathway) |
Antibody | Anti-Caspase-3 (rabbit polyclonal) | Santa cruz biotechnology | Cat. No. sc-7272 | WB (1:1000) | Marker of total caspase-3 protein |
Antibody | Anti-NF-κB (rabbit monoclonal) | Cell signaling | Cat. No. #8242 | WB (1:1000) | Transcription factors of the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) (inflammatory marker) |
Antibody | Anti-TNF-α (mouse monoclonal) | Santa cruz biotechnology | Cat. No. sc-52746 | WB (1:1000) | Tumor Necrosis Factor α (inflammatory marker) |
Antibody | Anti-IL-1β (rabbit polyclonal) | Santa cruz biotechnology | Cat. No. sc-7884 | WB (1:1000) | Interleukin-1 β (IL-1β) (inflammatory marker) |
Antibody | Anti-CXCR1 (rabbit polyclonal) | Thermofisher | Cat. No. #PA5-95749 | WB (1:1000) | Marker of chemokine receptors protein |
Antibody | Anti-iNOS (rabbit polyclonal) | Thermofisher | Cat. No. # PA1-036 | WB (1:1000) | Marker of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) |
Antibody | Anti-Cx43 (rabbit polyclonal) | Abcam | Cat. No. ab62252 | WB (1:8000) | Marker of Connexin-43 |
Antibody | Anti-Cx26 (mouse monoclonal) | Thermofisher | Cat. No. # 13-8100 | WB (1 µg/ml) | Marker of Connexin-26 |
Antibody | Anti-Cx30 (rabbit polyclonal) | Thermofisher | Cat. No. #71-2200 | WB (1 µg/ml) | Marker of Connexin 30 |
Antibody | Anti-Panx1 (rabbit polyclonal) | Thermofisher | Cat. No. #487900 | WB (1 mg/ml) | Marker of Pannexin 1 |
Antibody | Anti-Nitro tyrosine (rabbit) | Cell signaling | Cat. No. #06-284 | WB (1:1000) | Marker of protein tyrosine nitration |
Antibody | Anti-4HNE (rabbit polyclonal) | Alpha diagnostic international | Cat. No. #HNE11-S | WB (1:1000) | Detect the 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) a marker of lipid peroxidation |
Antibody | Anti-GAPDH (mouse monoclonal) | Abcam | Cat. No. ab8245 | WB (1:10,000) | Loading control |
Antibody |
Anti-β-tubulin (mouse monoclonal) |
Cell signaling | Cat. No. #2146 | WB (1:5000) | Loading control |
Antibody |
Anti-phospho-AMPA Receptor 1 (GluA1, Ser845) (rabbit polyclonal) |
Cell signaling | Cat. No. #8084 | WB (1:1000) | Receptor function, trafficking, and conductance |
Antibody | Anti-AMPA Receptor 1 (GluA1) (rabbit polyclonal) | Cell signaling | Cat. No. #13185 | WB (1:1000) | Total GluA1 levels |
To evaluate ROS production in the ACx we used dihydroethidium (DHE) staining as described in [9]. Fluorescent images were acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon Ti-E, Confocal Head A1 MP, Tokyo, Japan) with a 20 × objective lens.
To verify the specificity of fluorescence labeling, control experiments were obtained by omitting the primary antibodies in samples randomly selected (data not shown).
Morphological analyses in the ACx: glial cell morphology and neuronal spine density
To evaluate neuronal dendritic spine density in ACx pyramidal neurons of layer II/III, brains from Styrene and Ctrl animals (n = 3/group) were stained with the Golgi–Cox solution, according to previously published protocol [7–9]. Images were collected and analyzed by an Olympus BX63 microscope, equipped with a 100 × objective.
Macrophages, microglial and astrocyte cells were identified by immunofluorescence staining using IBA-1 and GFAP-specific antibodies to analyze cell morphology [72–74]. Thus, IBA-1 and GFAP positive-cells in the ACx were visualized with a Zeiss microscope with a motorized stage, connected to Neurolucida 7.5 software (MicroBright-Field). To analyze cell morphology, Sholl analysis was applied [75]. Only cells clearly detectable and displaying intact processes were taken into consideration. We analyzed several structural parameters, including: (1) process length (in µm); (2) the number of branch points (bifurcating nodes); (3) the total number of intersections between process and a shell and (4) average of total surface area in µm2 [76–78].
Western immunoblot and dot blot analyses
To obtain semi-quantitative data on protein levels, we performed western blots or dot blots on both cochlear and ACx lysates, obtained from at least 3/animals/group, as previously described [10, 79]. Briefly, total proteins were extracted using ice-cold RIPA buffer according to our previous published protocols [10, 80] and protein lysates (30 μg) were loaded onto Tris–glycine polyacrylamide gels for electrophoretic separation. Proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and, after 1 h with blocking buffer (5% skim milk in TBST), they were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with a solution containing antibodies against: caspase, cleaved-caspase 3, NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-1β, COX-2, CXCR1, GFAP, CD68, iNOS, Cx43, Cx26, Cx30, Panx1.
For dot blot, 5 μl of cochlear or ACx lysates (5 μg/μl) were spotted into a TBST pre-wetted nitrocellulose membrane as described previously [9]. Antibodies against 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT), and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) were used to evaluate protein tyrosine nitration and lipid peroxidation, respectively.
After incubation with primary antibody solution, western blot or dot blot membranes were washed in TBST and then incubated with HRP-conjugated mouse or rabbit secondary antibodies for 1 h at RT. Primary antibodies anti-GAPDH, or anti-β-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibody were used to make sure of equal protein loading. Detailed information about all antibodies used is reported in Table 1.
The quantification of protein levels was performed using UVItec Cambridge Alliance system. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
Sample size was determined after a power analysis performed to obtain a statistical power of 80% at an α level of 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed in a blind manner. The statistical tests used (two-way ANOVA or Student’s t test) are specified in the main text and in figure legends. Tukey’s Post-hoc was used for multiple comparisons (SigmaPlot 14.0 or Statistica, Statsoft). The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.
Results
Styrene exposure causes functional and morphological damage in the auditory system
To determine the role of microglia and astrocyte activation in the auditory system damage we used an experimental model of oto/neurotoxic injury caused by styrene administration. Figure 1 summarizes all experimental procedures and a timeline of the experimental plan. We previously reported that styrene exposure impinges on cochlear function, leading to hearing loss and diminished neuronal transmission times in primary afferent fibres [66, 67]. Here, we first confirmed our previous findings, showing that styrene administration induced an increase of auditory threshold of about 25 dB in click responses at the end of treatment (day 21, Fig. 2A; n = 14 rats for each group; Student’s t test, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between Ctrl and Ctrl-gavage in ABR values (data not shown), indicating no alteration of auditory function. The A–I curve derived from ABR wave II amplitude, for click responses at different intensity levels (dB), showed a significant decrease of amplitude responses in Styrene animals, compared to Ctrl group (Fig. 2B; n = 14 rats for each group; Student’s t test, p < 0.001). This functional injury was also associated with cochlear synaptic damage. Indeed, our immunofluorescence analysis on surface preparations of the organ of Corti showed fewer synaptic ribbons (Fig. 2C, D) in both outer (OHCs) and inner (IHCs) hair cells, associated with reduced number of primary afferent fibres in styrene-treated animals compared to controls (compare Fig. 2C with Fig. 2D).
Moving to the ACx, we studied synaptic responses after focal stimulation of ACx layer II/III neurons in slices from Styrene and Ctrl animals. Comparing the I/O curves, we observed that fEPSPs were significantly lower in rats exposed to styrene compared to controls (Fig. 3A; n = 17 slices from 4 Styrene and n = 16 slices from 4 Ctrl rats; two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc test, F(1,217) = 28,473, p < 0.001), indicating that basal synaptic transmission in ACx was altered by the toxic insult. At morphological level, we performed spine density analysis in ACx layer II/III neurons. We found a significant decrease of spine density in both neuronal apical and basal dendrites of styrene-treated animals with respect to controls (Fig. 3B–F, Student’s t test, p < 0.0001; Ctrl n = 40 segments from n = 3 rats/group and Styrene n = 30 segments analysed from n = 3 rats/group), indicating that the auditory toxic insult affected glutamatergic synapses in the ACx. Thus, at molecular level, we focused on the AMPA receptor phosphorylation (AMPAR) at Ser845 (pGluA1Ser845), which is known to be crucial in receptor function, trafficking, and conductance, also in experimental models of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity [81–84]. Western blot analyses on ACx lysates revealed a significant low level of pGluA1Ser845 in styrene-treated animals (Fig. 3G, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.022), confirming altered glutamatergic transmission. Finally, we found a significant high level of cleaved caspase-3 in ACx lysates of styrene-treated animals compared to controls, indicating the activation of apoptotic pathway (Fig. 3H, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.0004).
Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the cochlea and auditory cortex of styrene-treated animals
Previous studies, including ours, demonstrated redox imbalance associated with inflammation in the cochlea following styrene exposure [66, 67, 85]. Here, we extended our analyses to the whole auditory system by also studying central auditory brain structures, i.e., the ACx. First, we performed dot blot analyses showing high level of 4-HNE and 3-NT in Styrene cochlear samples (Fig. 4A, B, 3-NT n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.013; 4-HNE n = 4 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.006), thus indicating high level of protein tyrosine nitration and lipid peroxidation in animals treated with the toxic compound. Moreover, we studied nitric oxide (NO) production by analysing the level of inducible NOS (iNOS) that was significantly higher in cochlear samples of animals treated with styrene (Fig. 4C, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.029), with respect to controls. These findings confirmed that styrene cochlear injury involves oxidative damage, altering cochlear redox status. We also evaluated the cochlear level of cyclooxygenases-2 (COX-2), usually observed in response to inflammatory stimuli [86], by immunofluorescence and western blot analyses. Our results showed a marked COX-2 fluorescence in styrene-treated animals (Fig. 4E) compared to control specimens (Fig. 4D), specifically in the stria vascularis (Fig. 4d1, e1), the organ of Corti (Fig. 4d2, e2) and SGNs (Fig. 4d3, e3). The COX-2 high level in the cochlea of styrene-treated animals was also confirmed by western blot analyses (Fig. 4F, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.001). Finally, we focused on the chemokine receptors CXCR1, considering that it is activated by ROS production [87] and that the increase of inflammatory markers can modulate its transcription [88], and we found a significant high level of CXCR1 in cochlear lysates of styrene-treated animals with respect to controls (Fig. 4G, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.0002).
Interestingly, in the ACx we also observed enhanced ROS amount in styrene-treated animals compared to controls, as shown by DHE assay on coronal brain sections (Fig. 5A, B) and confirmed by semi-quantitative analysis of fluorescence signal (Fig. 5C, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p < 0.0001). This was associated with high levels of 3-NT and 4-HNE, as shown by dot blot (Fig. 5D, E, 3-NT n = 4 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.003; 4-HNE n = 4 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.016). Western blot analyses of ACx lysates also revealed a significant high level of inflammatory markers, including IL-1β, TNF-α and NFκB, in styrene-treated animals with respect to controls (Fig. 5F, H, IL-1β, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.024; TNF-α n = 4 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.001; NFκB n = 4 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.0005). According to what observed in the cochlea, we found a significant high COX-2 protein level also in the ACx of Styrene group compared to Ctrl (Fig. 5G, n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.03).
Collectively, these data demonstrate that the combined detrimental effect of oxidative stress and inflammation impinges on the auditory system of styrene-exposed rats, affecting both peripheral (cochlea) and central (ACx) regions.
Macrophages activation in the cochlea
Our immunofluorescence analyses in cochlear cryosection showed an increase of IBA-1 positive cells in samples of styrene-treated animals compared to controls (Fig. 6A–F), specifically in the lateral wall with stria vascularis (Fig. 6B, b1, E; Student’s t test, p = 0.0001) and SGNs (Fig. 6D, d1, F; Student’s t test, p = 0.002). Moreover, we found increased levels of the phagocytic marker CD68 in cochlear lysates of styrene-treated animals with respect to controls (Fig. 6G, n = 4 cochlea/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.03). Considering that supporting cells in the cochlear sensory epithelium, including Schwann cells and satellite cells, express GFAP [89], we also evaluated its expression in cochlear lysates, and we found a significant elevation of GFAP levels in styrene-treated animals, with respect to controls (Fig. 6H, n = 4 cochleae/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.009). Collectively, this data documented macrophages activation in the cochlea after styrene insult.
Microglia and astrocytes characterization in the ACx
In the ACx, we found an increase of CD68 expression in IBA-1 positive cells indicating macrophages/microglia activation following styrene toxic insult (Fig. 7A, B). Considering that functional alterations in microglia are usually associated with changes in their morphology [90], we further investigated the effects of the styrene administration on the structural features of glial cells. Specifically, microglia cells of styrene-treated animals showed shorter process length (Fig. 7C, Student’s t test, p = 0.002), diminished total area (Fig. 7D, Student’s t test, p = 0.017), reduced number of bifurcating nodes (Fig. 7E, Student’s t test, p = 0.02) and decreased number of intersections (Fig. 7F, Student’s t test, p = 0.007). Moreover, the increase of GFAP immunoreactivity in styrene-treated animals (Fig. 8A, B) was associated with morphological changes in astrocytes, with increased process length (Fig. 8C, Student’s t test, p = 0.03) and an increase of total area (Fig. 8D, Student’s t test, p = 0.03), number of bifurcating nodes (Fig. 8E, Student’s t test, p = 0.002) and number of intersections (Fig. 8F, Student’s t test, p = 0.03) in styrene-treated animals compared to controls.
Collectively, these data demonstrate that styrene toxic insult induced structural changes in glial cells, leading to a shift from “resting” to “active” morphology.
Altered connexin and pannexin expression contributes to glial cell activation and to the oxidative/inflammatory damage
Finally, we wondered if pannexons and gap junctions participate in the glial cell alterations reported above. In the ACx, we focused on Cx43, the major connexin isoform in the brain, and on Panx1. Our results showed a significant higher level of both Cx43 and Panx1 in brain samples of styrene-treated animals (Fig. 9A, B, Cx43 n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.03; Panx1 n = 3 animals/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.0001). In the cochlea, we focused on Cx30 and Cx26, that are known to play a crucial role in cochlear physiology [91, 92]. Differently from what observed in the brain, we found a strong reduction of Cx30 and Cx26 in the cochlea of styrene-treated animals, compared with control specimens (Fig. 9C, D, Cx26: n = 3 samples/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.04; Cx30: n = 3 samples/group; Student’s t test, p = 0.01). On the other hand, the expression of Panx1 was similar comparing Ctrl vs Styrene group (Fig. 9E, n = 3 samples/group; Student’s t test, p > 0.05).
Discussion
In this study, we explored the role of glial cells in the auditory system damage using a model of oto/neurotoxicity induced by styrene exposure. Indeed, even though several reports underlined the crucial role of microglia and astrocytes in mediating oxidative/inflammatory damage in brain disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases, the role of glial cells in the auditory system injury is still elusive. Here, we report that microglia and astrocytes mediate oxidative/inflammatory damage in the auditory system. Specifically, we demonstrated that the oto/neurotoxic insult induced by styrene increased oxidative stress and inflammation in both the cochlea and the ACx via macrophages and glial cell activation, involving altered expression of connexins and pannexin, probably dysregulating microglia/astrocyte networks.
First, we characterized our model of oto/neurotoxicity by assessing the detrimental effects of styrene exposure on both cochlea and ACx. In agreement with literature data [66, 67, 69], we found that styrene exposure induced a marked ototoxicity, as documented by the increase of auditory threshold associated with structural alterations in the cochlear sensory-neuronal compartment, such as decreased number of hair cell/neuronal afferent fiber contacts and decreased amplitude of ABR wave II, reflecting diminished number of neurons firing in the cochlear nuclei [70]. Interestingly, we also observed functional, morphological, and molecular alterations in the ACx of styrene-treated animals, with decreased basal synaptic transmission in the horizontal connections of auditory neurons, decreased number of dendritic spines and alterations in post-synaptic proteins, such as GluA1 phosphorylation. Specifically, phosphorylation at Ser845 GluA1 subunit is known to stabilize AMPA receptor at dendrites [93] and it is considered critical for sensory deprivation-induced homeostatic synaptic response and for experience-dependent synaptic plasticity [83, 84].
Several studies support the existence of a strong association between oxidative stress and inflammation in cochlear damage due to exogenous factors, including ototoxic injury. Indeed, when redox balance is altered, inflammatory response increases, triggering a vicious circle with a consequent rise of both ROS and pro-inflammatory cytokines [94–97]. The increase of oxidative stress observed not only in the cochlea but also in the ACx, confirms that the mechanism of action of styrene primarily involves mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress [98–101].
Looking for a cellular mechanism linking oxidative stress and inflammation, we focused on glial cells. Our analyses showed a high IBA-1 positive cells and GFAP level in the cochlea, paralleled to elevated of oxidative stress and inflammatory marker amount. Specifically, macrophages in the lateral wall and SGNs were activated, as revealed by the increased number of amoeboid cells with a pro-inflammatory and phagocytic phenotype. These findings agree with macrophages activation observed in different experimental models of cochlear damage, such as aminoglycoside ototoxicity, age-related hearing loss and noise exposure [38, 102–106]. Our western blot analyses also revelated high CD68 protein levels. Whether this was related to increased number of cells expressing CD68 in the cochlea, to inhibition of CD68 degradation, or to an increase in CD68 protein synthesis at the single-cell level, needs further investigations.
Activated glia cells can release several neurotoxic markers [107–109], including NO. The synthesis of NO is catalyzed by NO synthases (NOS) [110], such as iNOS. The latter is expressed in macrophages, microglia, astrocytes, and other cell types in response to inflammatory stimuli, LPS and cytokines [110, 111], and it has been found to be expressed by activated microglia [108, 111, 112]. Interestingly, in conjunction with higher protein tyrosine nitration and lipid peroxidation, as markers of oxidative stress, we found a significant high level of iNOS in cochlear lysates of styrene-treated animals. These data are also consistent with the elevated COX-2 level in the same samples, considering that COX-2 inhibitors can reduce iNOS expression in in vitro models of activated microglia [113]. The high level of the main inflammatory markers and of the chemokine receptor CXCR1, can be linked to the activation of glial cells. Indeed, it is known that microglia secrete inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-6, and chemokines [114–116]. This can lead to the activation of microglia NADPH oxidase and to neuronal death, through the formation of peroxynitrite and iNOS production [117]. Moreover, the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α, can increase iNOS [118–120], and the chemokine receptor CXCR1 [121] in neuronal cells.
The involvement of microglia and astrocytes was also confirmed by immunofluorescence and morphological analyses on brain sections. Traditionally, the morphology of microglia has been classified in a “resting” state, characterized by highly branched morphology, and an “active” state, in which cells show an amoeboid form with decreased branch complexity [122, 123]. Our morphological analyses in ACx confirmed the presence of morphological changes documenting microglial activation after styrene exposure, including diminished branch length, diminished number of bifurcating nodes, intersections, and surface area. Moreover, the increased expression of CD68 indicates phagocytic activity [124]. Similar to microglia, reactive astrocytes exhibit several molecular and morphological features, including increased GFAP expression [72, 125]. Following an injury, reactive astrocytes increased in number and show altered morphology with hypertrophy of cellular processes [126, 127]. Accordingly, our data reports an increase of astrocytic branching complexity in the ACx of Styrene group, compared to controls.
Finally, considering that pro-inflammatory signaling occurs via gap junctions, hemichannels, and pannexons, favoring the shift between resting and active microglia near the injury site, we looked for connexin and pannexin expression in the cochlea and in ACx after styrene exposure. Interestingly, in the ACx we found an elevated level of Cx43 and Panx1, two proteins playing a crucial role in microglia and astrocyte coupling [51]. Indeed, when microglia become activated, the expression level of connexins, particularly Cx43, increases [49, 128, 129]. In physiological condition, astrocytes are strongly paired via gap junctions, expressing high levels of Cx43 [130]. However, decreased Cx43 amount have been observed in astrocytes cultured with resting microglia [56], whereas increased Cx43 expression was observed following LPS treatment [59]. Moreover, Cx43 and Panx1 functioning is also modulated by several inflammatory/toxic agents, including TNF-α, interferon gamma (IFN-γ) or amyloid-beta protein [129]. Similarly, Cx43 participates to ROS spreading among cells [131]. In addition, increased surface levels of Panx1 and Cx43 correlates with channel opening and microglial activation [132]. Finally, Panx1 channels activity can modulate microglial morphology and microglia/neurons interactions [133].
In the cochlea we studied Panx1 and, among connexins, we focused on the two main connexins playing a crucial role in inner ear physiology, i.e., Cx26 and Cx30 [91, 134]. In contrast to what observed in the brain, we found a downregulation of connexins and no changes in pannexin expression in the cochlea of styrene-treated animals compared to controls. This different pattern of connexin/pannexin modulation in the cochlea and ACx seems to be inconsistent; however, it should be considered the different functional expression of connexins and pannexins in the brain and in the inner ear. Indeed, while Cx43 and Panx1 have been related to microglia activation in the CNS [51], Cx30 and Cx26 are essential for hearing function, given that deletion of the GJB2 and GJB6 genes, encoding for Cx26 and Cx30, respectively, is the main cause of non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss in the Mediterranean population [135–137]. Moreover, in animal models of age-related hearing loss it has been demonstrated that oxidative stress can downregulate cochlear Cx26 and Cx30 expression [138, 139]. On the other hand, decreased Cx26 and Cx30 levels can exacerbate redox imbalance, impairing the endogenous antioxidant enzyme efflux in the cochlear sensory epithelium [92, 140]. Thus, our data seem to be consistent with the increased oxidative stress observed in styrene-treated samples. Notably, we did not find a significant difference in Panx1 cochlear level between styrene-exposed and control animals. However, the role of Panx1 in the cochlea is controversial, with some studies suggesting that altered Panx1 expression can cause hearing loss [141, 142] and others supporting the idea that Panx1 is dispensable for hearing [143, 144].
Conclusions
Collectively, our data indicate that the oto/neurotoxic effects of styrene rely on oxidative/inflammatory damage occurring in both the cochlea and ACx. In both auditory structures activated macrophages, microglia and astrocytes mediate the crosstalk between oxidative stress and inflammation, also via the altered expression of connexins and pannexins. Specifically, in the cochlea the ototoxic effect of styrene induces an increase of oxidative stress with diminished connexin expression (probably exacerbating redox imbalance), macrophages activation and increased inflammation. In the ACx, the neurotoxic insult causes oxidative stress, microglia, and astrocyte activation with increased neuroinflammation and decreased connexin and pannexin expression. This probably causes alterations in microglia/astrocytes coupling, exacerbating neuroinflammation.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of "Microscopy" Core Facility G-STeP and the contribution of the Core Facility G-STeP "Electrophysiology", Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS.
Author contributions
FP: formal analysis, investigation, data curation, conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation; AP, RM, VMH, GB: formal analysis, investigation, data curation; RR: formal analysis; CR: validation, data curation; RS: validation, data curation; ARF: supervision; funding acquisition; CG: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition.
Funding
This work was supported by “Fondi BRIC INAIL 2022”. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore contributed to the funding of this research project and its publication (D1, D3.1 intramural funds). Financial support of “Ricerca Corrente 2023” from Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS to C.G.
Availability of data and materials
The data included in the article are available from the corresponding author.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and number, in agreement with the European Community Council Directive of 24 November 1986(86/609/EEC). All procedures were performed in accordance with the Laboratory of Animal Care and Use Committee of the Catholic University, School of Medicine of Rome and were approved by the Italian Department of Health (Ministero della Salute, Prot. 1F295.116).
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Fetoni AR, Troiani D, Petrosini L, Paludetti G. Cochlear injury and adaptive plasticity of the auditory cortex. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:8. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang J, Puel J-L. Toward cochlear therapies. Physiol Rev. 2018;98:2477–2522. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00053.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res. 2015;330:191–199. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Muly S. Synaptophysin in the cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma. Exp Neurol. 2002;177:202–221. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim JJ, Gross J, Potashner SJ, Morest DK. Fine structure of long-term changes in the cochlear nucleus after acoustic overstimulation: chronic degeneration and new growth of synaptic endings. J Neurosci Res. 2004;77:817–828. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muly SM, Gross JS, Potashner SJ. Noise trauma altersD-[3H]aspartate release and AMPA binding in chinchilla cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci Res. 2004;75:585–596. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fetoni AR, De Bartolo P, Eramo SLM, Rolesi R, Paciello F, Bergamini C, et al. Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) as a target of oxidative stress-mediated damage: cochlear and cortical responses after an increase in antioxidant defense. J Neurosci. 2013;33:4011–4023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2282-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paciello F, Podda MV, Rolesi R, Cocco S, Petrosini L, Troiani D, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation affects auditory cortex plasticity in normal-hearing and noise-exposed rats. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:1008–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paciello F, Rinaudo M, Longo V, Cocco S, Conforto G, Pisani A, et al. Auditory sensory deprivation induced by noise exposure exacerbates cognitive decline in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Elife. 2021;10:e70908. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paciello F, Pisani A, Rinaudo M, Cocco S, Paludetti G, Fetoni AR, et al. Noise-induced auditory damage affects hippocampus causing memory deficits in a model of early age-related hearing loss. Neurobiol Dis. 2023;178:106024. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wakabayashi K, Fujioka M, Kanzaki S, Okano HJ, Shibata S, Yamashita D, et al. Blockade of interleukin-6 signaling suppressed cochlear inflammatory response and improved hearing impairment in noise-damaged mice cochlea. Neurosci Res. 2010;66:345–352. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tan WJT, Thorne PR, Vlajkovic SM. Characterisation of cochlear inflammation in mice following acute and chronic noise exposure. Histochem Cell Biol. 2016;146:219–230. doi: 10.1007/s00418-016-1436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Benkafadar N, Menardo J, Bourien J, Nouvian R, François F, Decaudin D, et al. Reversible p53 inhibition prevents cisplatin ototoxicity without blocking chemotherapeutic efficacy. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9:7–26. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201606230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shen Y, Hu H, Fan C, Wang Q, Zou T, Ye B, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss may lead to dementia-related pathological changes in hippocampal neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;156:105408. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Block ML, Zecca L, Hong J-S. Microglia-mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:57–69. doi: 10.1038/nrn2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lin M, Yu H, Xie Q, Xu Z, Shang P. Role of microglia autophagy and mitophagy in age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;14:1100133. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1100133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fujikawa R, Tsuda M. The functions and phenotypes of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells. 2023;12:1207. doi: 10.3390/cells12081207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abe N, Nishihara T, Yorozuya T, Tanaka J. Microglia and macrophages in the pathological central and peripheral nervous systems. Cells. 2020;9:2132. doi: 10.3390/cells9092132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Morris G, Gevezova M, Sarafian V, Maes M. Redox regulation of the immune response. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:1079–1101. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00902-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rasband MN. Glial contributions to neural function and disease. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15:355–361. doi: 10.1074/mcp.R115.053744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Garland EF, Hartnell IJ, Boche D. Microglia and astrocyte function and communication: what do we know in humans? Front Neurosci. 2022;16:824888. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.824888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Valles SL, Singh SK, Campos-Campos J, Colmena C, Campo-Palacio I, Alvarez-Gamez K, et al. Functions of astrocytes under normal conditions and after a brain disease. IJMS. 2023;24:8434. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cuadros MA, Sepulveda MR, Martin-Oliva D, Marín-Teva JL, Neubrand VE. Microglia and microglia-like cells: similar but different. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:816439. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.816439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miron VE, Priller J. Investigating microglia in health and disease: challenges and opportunities. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:785–793. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science. 2011;333:1456–1458. doi: 10.1126/science.1202529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schafer DP, Stevens B. Phagocytic glial cells: sculpting synaptic circuits in the developing nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:1034–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cramer KS, Rubel EW. Glial cell contributions to auditory brainstem development. Front Neural Circuits. 2016;10:83. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stevens B, Allen NJ, Vazquez LE, Howell GR, Christopherson KS, Nouri N, et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell. 2007;131:1164–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jurga AM, Paleczna M, Kuter KZ. Overview of general and discriminating markers of differential microglia phenotypes. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:198. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Paolicelli RC, Sierra A, Stevens B, Tremblay M-E, Aguzzi A, Ajami B, et al. Microglia states and nomenclature: a field at its crossroads. Neuron. 2022;110:3458–3483. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang H, He W, Tang T, Qiu M. Immunological markers for central nervous system glia. Neurosci Bull. 2023;39:379–392. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00938-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Butovsky O, Weiner HL. Microglial signatures and their role in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19:622–635. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0057-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li Q, Barres BA. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:225–242. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Borst K, Dumas AA, Prinz M. Microglia: immune and non-immune functions. Immunity. 2021;54:2194–2208. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Davies LC, Taylor PR. Tissue-resident macrophages: then and now. Immunology. 2015;144:541–548. doi: 10.1111/imm.12451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Keithley EM. Inner ear immunity. Hear Res. 2022;419:108518. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mosser DM, Edwards JP. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:958–969. doi: 10.1038/nri2448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hough K, Verschuur CA, Cunningham C, Newman TA. Macrophages in the cochlea; an immunological link between risk factors and progressive hearing loss. Glia. 2022;70:219–238. doi: 10.1002/glia.24095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Alliot F, Godin I, Pessac B. Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain. Dev Brain Res. 1999;117:145–152. doi: 10.1016/S0165-3806(99)00113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, Nandi S, See P, Gokhan S, et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science. 2010;330:841–845. doi: 10.1126/science.1194637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Katsumoto A, Lu H, Miranda AS, Ransohoff RM. Ontogeny and functions of central nervous system macrophages. J Immunol. 2014;193:2615–2621. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hirose K, Discolo CM, Keasler JR, Ransohoff R. Mononuclear phagocytes migrate into the murine cochlea after acoustic trauma. J Comparative Neurol. 2005;489:180–194. doi: 10.1002/cne.20619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Parisi L, Gini E, Baci D, Tremolati M, Fanuli M, Bassani B, et al. Macrophage polarization in chronic inflammatory diseases: killers or builders? J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:1–25. doi: 10.1155/2018/8917804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Spencer NG, Schilling T, Miralles F, Eder C. Mechanisms underlying interferon-γ-induced priming of microglial reactive oxygen species production. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Simpson DSA, Oliver PL. ROS generation in microglia: understanding oxidative stress and inflammation in neurodegenerative disease. Antioxidants. 2020;9:743. doi: 10.3390/antiox9080743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Smith AN, Shaughness M, Collier S, Hopkins D, Byrnes KR. Therapeutic targeting of microglia mediated oxidative stress after neurotrauma. Front Med. 2022;9:1034692. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1034692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Loane DJ, Kumar A. Microglia in the TBI brain: the good, the bad, and the dysregulated. Exp Neurol. 2016;275:316–327. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Członkowska A, Kurkowska-Jastrzębska I, Członkowski A, Peter D, Stefano GB. Immune processes in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease – a potential role for microglia and nitric oxide. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:165–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Eugenín EA, Eckardt D, Theis M, Willecke K, Bennett MVL, Sáez JC. Microglia at brain stab wounds express connexin 43 and in vitro form functional gap junctions after treatment with interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4190–4195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051634298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Retamal MA, Cortés CJ, Reuss L, Bennett MVL, Sáez JC. S-nitrosylation and permeation through connexin 43 hemichannels in astrocytes: induction by oxidant stress and reversal by reducing agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:4475–4480. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511118103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gajardo-Gómez R, Labra VC, Orellana JA. Connexins and pannexins: new insights into microglial functions and dysfunctions. Front Mol Neurosci. 2016;6:9. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Seo JH, Dalal MS, Contreras JE. Pannexin-1 channels as mediators of neuroinflammation. IJMS. 2021;22:5189. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Caruso G, Di Pietro L, Caraci F. Gap junctions and connexins in microglia-related oxidative stress and neuroinflammation: perspectives for drug discovery. Biomolecules. 2023;13:505. doi: 10.3390/biom13030505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Suadicani SO, Brosnan CF, Scemes E. P2X 7 receptors mediate ATP release and amplification of astrocytic intercellular Ca 2+ signaling. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1378–1385. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3902-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scemes E, Suadicani SO, Dahl G, Spray DC. Connexin and pannexin mediated cell–cell communication. Neuron Glia Biol. 2007;3:199–208. doi: 10.1017/S1740925X08000069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rouach N, Calvo C-F, Glowinski J, Giaume C. Brain macrophages inhibit gap junctional communication and downregulate connexin 43 expression in cultured astrocytes: brain macrophages and gap junctions in astrocytes. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;15:403–407. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01868.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Faustmann PM, Haase CG, Romberg S, Hinkerohe D, Szlachta D, Smikalla D, et al. Microglia activation influences dye coupling and Cx43 expression of the astrocytic network. Glia. 2003;42:101–108. doi: 10.1002/glia.10141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hinkerohe D, Smikalla D, Haghikia A, Heupel K, Haase CG, Dermietzel R, et al. Effects of cytokines on microglial phenotypes and astroglial coupling in an inflammatory coculture model. Glia. 2005;52:85–97. doi: 10.1002/glia.20223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Même W, Calvo C, Froger N, Ezan P, Amigou E, Koulakoff A, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines released from microglia inhibit gap junctions in astrocytes: potentiation by β-amyloid. FASEB j. 2006;20:494–496. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4297fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Retamal MA, Froger N, Palacios-Prado N, Ezan P, Sáez PJ, Sáez JC, et al. Cx43 hemichannels and gap junction channels in astrocytes are regulated oppositely by proinflammatory cytokines released from activated microglia. J Neurosci. 2007;27:13781–13792. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2042-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Orellana JA, Froger N, Ezan P, Jiang JX, Bennett MVL, Naus CC, et al. ATP and glutamate released via astroglial connexin 43 hemichannels mediate neuronal death through activation of pannexin 1 hemichannels: astroglial hemichannels induce neuronal death. J Neurochem. 2011;118:826–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07210.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fuentes-Santamaría V, Alvarado JC, Juiz JM. Long-term interaction between microglial cells and cochlear nucleus neurons after bilateral cochlear ablation. J Comp Neurol. 2012;520:2974–2990. doi: 10.1002/cne.23088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Baizer JS, Wong KM, Manohar S, Hayes SH, Ding D, Dingman R, et al. Effects of acoustic trauma on the auditory system of the rat: the role of microglia. Neuroscience. 2015;303:299–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Campos Torres A, Vidal PP, de Waele C. Evidence for a microglial reaction within the vestibular and cochlear nuclei following inner ear lesion in the rat. Neuroscience. 1999;92:1475–1490. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Noda M, Hatano M, Hattori T, Takarada-Iemata M, Shinozaki T, Sugimoto H, et al. Microglial activation in the cochlear nucleus after early hearing loss in rats. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019;46:716–723. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fetoni AR, Paciello F, Rolesi R, Pisani A, Moleti A, Sisto R, et al. Styrene targets sensory and neural cochlear function through the crossroad between oxidative stress and inflammation. Free Radical Biol Med. 2021;163:31–42. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fetoni AR, Rolesi R, Paciello F, Eramo SLM, Grassi C, Troiani D, et al. Styrene enhances the noise induced oxidative stress in the cochlea and affects differently mechanosensory and supporting cells. Free Radical Biol Med. 2016;101:211–225. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sisto R, Cerini L, Gatto MP, Gherardi M, Gordiani A, Sanjust F, et al. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to exposure to styrene and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;134:3739–3748. doi: 10.1121/1.4824618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen G-D, Henderson D. Cochlear injuries induced by the combined exposure to noise and styrene. Hear Res. 2009;254:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Alvarado JC, Fuentes-Santamaría V, Jareño-Flores T, Blanco JL, Juiz JM. Normal variations in the morphology of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms: a study in wistar rats. Neurosci Res. 2012;73:302–311. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2012.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 2. San Diego: Academic; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS. GFAP and astrogliosis. Brain Pathol. 1994;4:229–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1994.tb00838.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hol EM, Pekny M. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous system. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;32:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Korzhevskii DE, Kirik OV. Brain microglia and microglial markers. Neurosci Behav Physi. 2016;46:284–290. doi: 10.1007/s11055-016-0231-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sholl DA. The measurable parameters of the cerebral cortex and their significance in its organization. Prog Neurobiol. 1956;2:324e33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Bisicchia E, Sasso V, Catanzaro G, Leuti A, Besharat ZM, Chiacchiarini M, et al. Resolvin D1 halts remote neuroinflammation and improves functional recovery after focal brain damage via ALX/FPR2 receptor-regulated MicroRNAs. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55:6894–6905. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-0889-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kongsui R, Beynon SB, Johnson SJ, Walker FR. Quantitative assessment of microglial morphology and density reveals remarkable consistency in the distribution and morphology of cells within the healthy prefrontal cortex of the rat. J Neuroinflammation. 2014;11:182. doi: 10.1186/s12974-014-0182-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Catale C, Bisicchia E, Carola V, Viscomi MT. Early life stress exposure worsens adult remote microglia activation, neuronal death, and functional recovery after focal brain injury. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;94:89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fetoni AR, Pisani A, Rolesi R, Paciello F, Viziano A, Moleti A, et al. Early noise-induced hearing loss accelerates presbycusis altering aging processes in the cochlea. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:803973. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.803973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Fetoni AR, Eramo SLM, Paciello F, Rolesi R, Samengo D, Paludetti G, et al. The redox protein p66shc mediates cochlear vascular dysfunction and transient noise-induced hearing loss. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25450. doi: 10.1038/srep25450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Havekes R, Timmer M, Van der Zee EA. Regional differences in hippocampal PKA immunoreactivity after training and reversal training in a spatial Y-maze task. Hippocampus. 2007;17:338–348. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Man H-Y, Sekine-Aizawa Y, Huganir RL. Regulation of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor trafficking through PKA phosphorylation of the Glu receptor 1 subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:3579–3584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611698104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.He K, Song L, Cummings LW, Goldman J, Huganir RL, Lee H-K. Stabilization of Ca 2+ -permeable AMPA receptors at perisynaptic sites by GluR1-S845 phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:20033–20038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910338106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Goel A, Xu LW, Snyder KP, Song L, Goenaga-Vazquez Y, Megill A, et al. Phosphorylation of AMPA receptors is required for sensory deprivation-induced homeostatic synaptic plasticity. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Chen G-D, Chi L-H, Kostyniak PJ, Henderson D. Styrene induced alterations in biomarkers of exposure and effects in the cochlea: mechanisms of hearing loss. Toxicol Sci. 2007;98:167–177. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Vane JR, Bakhle YS, Botting R. Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;38:97–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.38.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jones SA, Wolf M, Qin S, Mackay CR, Baggiolini M. Different functions for the interleukin 8 receptors (IL-8R) of human neutrophil leukocytes: NADPH oxidase and phospholipase D are activated through IL-8R1 but not IL-8R2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:6682–6686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.13.6682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Cambier S, Gouwy M, Proost P. The chemokines CXCL8 and CXCL12: molecular and functional properties, role in disease and efforts towards pharmacological intervention. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20:217–251. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-00974-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rio C, Dikkes P, Liberman MC, Corfas G. Glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and promoter activity in the inner ear of developing and adult mice. J Comp Neurol. 2002;442:156–162. doi: 10.1002/cne.10085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Salter MW, Stevens B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat Med. 2017;23:1018–1027. doi: 10.1038/nm.4397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Mammano F. Inner ear connexin channels: roles in development and maintenance of cochlear function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019;9:a033233. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a033233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Paciello F, Zorzi V, Raspa M, Scavizzi F, Grassi C, Mammano F, et al. Connexin 30 deletion exacerbates cochlear senescence and age-related hearing loss. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:950837. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.950837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kessels HW, Kopec CD, Klein ME, Malinow R. Roles of stargazin and phosphorylation in the control of AMPA receptor subcellular distribution. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:888–896. doi: 10.1038/nn.2340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Morgan MJ, Liu Z. Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-κB signaling. Cell Res. 2011;21:103–115. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Blaser H, Dostert C, Mak TW, Brenner D. TNF and ROS Crosstalk in Inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kalinec GM, Lomberk G, Urrutia RA, Kalinec F. Resolution of cochlear inflammation: novel target for preventing or ameliorating drug-, noise- and age-related hearing loss. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:192. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Fetoni AR, Paciello F, Rolesi R, Paludetti G, Troiani D. Targeting dysregulation of redox homeostasis in noise-induced hearing loss: oxidative stress and ROS signaling. Free Radical Biol Med. 2019;135:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Daré E, Tofighi R, Nutt L, Vettori MV, Emgård M, Mutti A, et al. Styrene 7,8-oxide induces mitochondrial damage and oxidative stress in neurons. Toxicology. 2004;201:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2004.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Vettori MV, Caglieri A, Goldoni M, Castoldi AF, Darè E, Alinovi R, et al. Analysis of oxidative stress in SK-N-MC neurons exposed to styrene-7,8-oxide. Toxicol In Vitro. 2005;19:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Meszka-Jordan A, Mahlapuu R, Soomets U, Carlson GP. Oxidative stress due to (R)-styrene oxide exposure and the role of antioxidants in non-Swiss albino (NSA) mice. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2009;72:642–650. doi: 10.1080/15287390902769436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sisto R, Botti T, Cerini L, Sanjust F, Tranfo G, Bonanni RC, et al. Oxidative stress biomarkers and otoacoustic emissions in humans exposed to styrene and noise. Int J Audiol. 2016;55:523–531. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1177215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Fuentes-Santamaría V, Alvarado JC, Melgar-Rojas P, Gabaldón-Ull MC, Miller JM, Juiz JM. The role of glia in the peripheral and central auditory system following noise overexposure: contribution of TNF-α and IL-1β to the pathogenesis of hearing loss. Front Neuroanat. 2017;11:9. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Wang Z, Li H. Microglia-like cells in rat organ of corti following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. NeuroReport. 2000;11:1389–1393. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200005150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ladrech S, Wang J, Simonneau L, Puel J-L, Lenoir M. Macrophage contribution to the response of the rat organ of Corti to amikacin. J Neurosci Res. 2007;85:1970–1979. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Noble K, Brown L, Elvis P, Lang H. Cochlear immune response in presbyacusis: a focus on dysregulation of macrophage activity. JARO. 2022;23:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10162-021-00819-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kaur T, Ohlemiller KK, Warchol ME. Genetic disruption of fractalkine signaling leads to enhanced loss of cochlear afferents following ototoxic or acoustic injury. J Comp Neurol. 2018;526:824–835. doi: 10.1002/cne.24369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Colton CA. Heterogeneity of microglial activation in the innate immune response in the brain. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009;4:399–418. doi: 10.1007/s11481-009-9164-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Garden GA, Möller T. Microglia biology in health and disease. Jrnl NeuroImmune Pharm. 2006;1:127–137. doi: 10.1007/s11481-006-9015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Saijo K, Glass CK. Microglial cell origin and phenotypes in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:775–787. doi: 10.1038/nri3086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:315–424. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Brown GC, Neher JJ. Inflammatory neurodegeneration and mechanisms of microglial killing of neurons. Mol Neurobiol. 2010;41:242–247. doi: 10.1007/s12035-010-8105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Saha RN, Pahan K. Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase gene in glial cells. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006;8:929–947. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.8.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Minghetti L, Nicolini A, Polazzi E, Créminon C, Maclouf J, Levi G. Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in activated rat microglial cultures is downregulated by exogenous prostaglandin E2 and by cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Glia. 1997;19:152–160. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199702)19:2<152::AID-GLIA6>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Kempermann G, Neumann H. Microglia: the enemy within? Science. 2003;302:1689–1690. doi: 10.1126/science.1092864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Graeber MB, Li W, Rodriguez ML. Role of microglia in CNS inflammation. FEBS Lett. 2011;585:3798–3805. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Muzio L, Viotti A, Martino G. Microglia in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration: from understanding to therapy. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:742065. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.742065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Mander P, Brown GC. Activation of microglial NADPH oxidase is synergistic with glial iNOS expression in inducing neuronal death: a dual-key mechanism of inflammatory neurodegeneration. J Neuroinflammation. 2005;2:20. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-2-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ogura T, Tatemichi M, Esumi H. TNF-a mediates inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in human neuroblastoma cell line by cisplatin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;233:788–791. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Heneka MT, Löschmann P-A, Gleichmann M, Weller M, Schulz JB, Wüllner U, et al. Induction of nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide-mediated apoptosis in neuronal PC12 cells after stimulation with tumor necrosis factor-α/lipopolysaccharide. J Neurochem. 2002;71:88–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71010088.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Combs CK, Karlo JC, Kao S-C, Landreth GE. beta-Amyloid stimulation of microglia and monocytes results in TNFalpha-dependent expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and neuronal apoptosis. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1179–1188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-04-01179.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Flynn G, Maru S, Loughlin J, Romero IA, Male D. Regulation of chemokine receptor expression in human microglia and astrocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 2003;136:84–93. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(03)00009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Madore C, Joffre C, Delpech JC, De Smedt-Peyrusse V, Aubert A, Coste L, et al. Early morphofunctional plasticity of microglia in response to acute lipopolysaccharide. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;34:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Sierra A, Abiega O, Shahraz A, Neumann H. Janus-faced microglia: beneficial and detrimental consequences of microglial phagocytosis. Front Cell Neurosci 2013;7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 124.Waller R, Baxter L, Fillingham DJ, Coelho S, Pozo JM, Mozumder M, et al. Iba-1-/CD68+ microglia are a prominent feature of age-associated deep subcortical white matter lesions. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Yang Z, Wang KKW. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: from intermediate filament assembly and gliosis to neurobiomarker. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38:364–374. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Wilhelmsson U, Bushong EA, Price DL, Smarr BL, Phung V, Terada M, et al. Redefining the concept of reactive astrocytes as cells that remain within their unique domains upon reaction to injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17513–17518. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602841103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wilhelmsson U, Li L, Pekna M, Berthold C-H, Blom S, Eliasson C, et al. Absence of glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin prevents hypertrophy of astrocytic processes and improves post-traumatic regeneration. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5016–5021. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0820-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Garg S, Syed MM, Kielian T. Staphylococcus aureus-derived peptidoglycan induces Cx43 expression and functional gap junction intercellular communication in microglia. J Neurochem. 2005;95:475–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03384.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Sáez PJ, Shoji KF, Retamal MA, Harcha PA, Ramírez G, Jiang JX, et al. ATP is required and advances cytokine-induced gap junction formation in microglia in vitro. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2013/216402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Giaume C, Fromaget C, el Aoumari A, Cordier J, Glowinski J, Gros D. Gap junctions in cultured astrocytes: single-channel currents and characterization of channel-forming protein. Neuron. 1991;6:133–143. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90128-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zhang J, Riquelme MA, Hua R, Acosta FM, Gu S, Jiang JX. Connexin 43 hemichannels regulate mitochondrial ATP generation, mobilization, and mitochondrial homeostasis against oxidative stress. Elife. 2022;11:e82206. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Orellana JA, Shoji KF, Abudara V, Ezan P, Amigou E, Sáez PJ, et al. Amyloid β-induced death in neurons involves glial and neuronal hemichannels. J Neurosci. 2011;31:4962–4977. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6417-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Li Y, Du X, Du J. Resting microglia respond to and regulate neuronal activity in vivo. Commun Integr Biol. 2013;6:e24493. doi: 10.4161/cib.24493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Verselis VK. Connexin hemichannels and cochlear function. Neurosci Lett. 2019;695:40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Snoeckx RL, Huygen PLM, Feldmann D, Marlin S, Denoyelle F, Waligora J, et al. GJB2 mutations and degree of hearing loss: a multicenter study. Am J Human Genet. 2005;77:945–957. doi: 10.1086/497996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kenna MA, Feldman HA, Neault MW, Frangulov A, Wu B-L, Fligor B, et al. Audiologic phenotype and progression in GJB2 (Connexin 26) hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:81. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.del Castillo FJ, del Castillo I. DFNB1 non-syndromic hearing impairment: diversity of mutations and associated phenotypes. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:428. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Tajima S, Danzaki K, Ikeda K, Kamiya K. Degradation and modification of cochlear gap junction proteins in the early development of age-related hearing loss. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:166–175. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0377-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Ichimiya I, Suzuki M, Mogi G. Age-related changes in the murine cochlear lateral wall. Hear Res. 2000;139:116–122. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00170-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Fetoni AR, Zorzi V, Paciello F, Ziraldo G, Peres C, Raspa M, et al. Cx26 partial loss causes accelerated presbycusis by redox imbalance and dysregulation of Nfr2 pathway. Redox Biol. 2018;19:301–317. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Zhao H-B, Zhu Y, Liang C, Chen J. Pannexin 1 deficiency can induce hearing loss. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;463:143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Chen J, Liang C, Zong L, Zhu Y, Zhao H-B. Knockout of pannexin-1 induces hearing loss. IJMS. 2018;19:1332. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Abitbol JM, Kelly JJ, Barr K, Schormans AL, Laird DW, Allman BL. Differential effects of pannexins on noise-induced hearing loss. Biochem J. 2016;473:4665–4680. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Zorzi V, Paciello F, Ziraldo G, Peres C, Mazzarda F, Nardin C, et al. Mouse Panx1 is dispensable for hearing acquisition and auditory function. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:379. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data included in the article are available from the corresponding author.