Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 11;47(1):e24172. doi: 10.1002/clc.24172

Table 3.

GLS and myocardial work parameters between two groups and study phase.

Intensive treatment (N = 66) Standard treatment (N = 50) p Value
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 1 Phase 2 Treatment Phase
GLS (%) −17.4 ± 2.1 −16.0 ± 2.8 −17.6 ± 2.4 −16.4 ± 2.6 .518 <.001
GWI (mmHg%) 1721.4 ± 192.8 1546.0 ± 286.1 1788.0 ± 264.4 1720.6 ± 269.7 .052*,
GCW (mmHg%) 2071.4 ± 231.5 1922.4 ± 265.9 2156.5 ± 279.8 2125.3 ± 274.2 .045*,
GWW (mmHg%) 158.7 ± 110.2 192.4 ± 108.3 140.0 ± 78.1 186.1 ± 124.0 .445 .001
GWE (%) 91.9 ± 4.2 89.6 ± 5.5 92.8 ± 3.3 91.2 ± 4.7 .087 <.001

Note: If no interaction between phase and treatment group exists, then data were analyzed together, with the p values as shown in the final two columns. If a phase × treatment interaction exists (i.e., effects differ over time between the two groups), this p value is shown across both final columns, then data were analyzed separately by phase and treatment. p < .05 intensive versus standard phase 1. p < .05 phase 1 versus phase 2 standard.

Abbreviation: GCW, global constructive work; GLS, global longitudinal strain; GWE, global work efficiency; GWI, global work index; GWW, global wasted work.

*

p < .05 phase 1 versus phase 2 intensive.

p < .05 intensive versus standard phase 2.