Hwang 1999d.

Methods	Study design: randomised controlled trial Object of randomisation: workers
Participants	Taiwan 35 physicians, 30 nurses and 1 technician wearing routinely rubber gloves Number studied: 336 gloves Group 1: n = 80; Group 2: n = 148; Group 3: n = 46; Group 4: n = 62
Interventions	Comparison of four different types of (single) gloves
Outcomes	Outcome: number of perforated or torn gloves per total number of gloves Perforation detection: visual examination Secondary outcome: user satisfaction, allergic reactions
Notes	Not reported which were intervention gloves and which were control gloves