Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;2015(5):CD006258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006258.pub2

1. Categories of interventions used in individual studies and duration of follow‐up.

Study ID Intervention Duration Number of patients
Altieri 2004 HDF versus HF 12 months 39
Bammens 2004 HDF versus HD 2 weeks 14
Basile 2001 AFB versus HD 12 months 11
Beerenhout 2005 HF versus HD 12 months 40
Bolasco 2003 HF versus HDF versus HD 18 months 146
Coll 2009 AFB versus HDF 15 months 30
CONTRAST (Dutch) Study 2005 HDF versus HD 36 months 714
Cristofano 2004 HDF versus HD 1 session 12
Ding 2002 HDF versus AFB 36 weeks 12
Eiselt 2000 AFB versus HD 12 months 20
ESHOL Study 2011 HDF versus HD 36 months 906
Fox 1993 HF versus HD 1 session 9
Kantartzi 2013 HDF versus HD 3 months 24
Karamperis 2005 HDF versus HD 2 sessions 12
Lin 2001 HDF versus HD 15 months 67
Locatelli 1994 HDF versus HD 24 months 205
Lornoy 1998 HDF versus HD 1 session 8
Mandolfo 2008 HDF versus HD 6 weeks 8
Meert 2009 HDF versus HF 9 weeks 14
Movilli 1996 HDF versus AFB 6 months 12
Noris 1998 AFB versus HD 1 week 5
Ohtake 2012 HDF versus HD 12 months 22
Pedrini 2011a HDF versus HD 12 months 69
PROFIL Study 2011 HF versus HD 24 months 48
Righetti 2010 HDF versus HD 18 months 24
Santoro 1999 AFB versus HD 48 months 371
Santoro 2005a HF versus HD 36 months 64
Schiffl 1992 HF versus HD 48 months 32
Schiffl 2007 HDF versus HD 48 months 76
Schrander vd Meer 1998 AFB versus HD 12 months 24
Selby 2006a AFB versus HD 4 weeks 12
Stefansson 2012 HDF versus HD 4 months 20
Teo 1987 HDF versus HD 8 months 13
Todeschini 2002 AFB versus HD 3 sessions 9
Tuccillo 2002 HDF versus HD 3 months 12
TURKISH HDF 2013 HDF versus HD 24 months 782
Vaslaki 2006 HDF versus HD 48 weeks 129
Verzetti 1998 AFB versus HD 12 months 41
Ward 2000 HDF versus HD 12 months 50
Wizemann 2000 HDF versus HD 24 months 44

AFB ‐ acetate‐free biofiltration; HDF ‐ haemodiafiltration; HD ‐ haemodialysis; HF ‐ haemofiltration