Bolasco 2003.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group 1
Treatment group 2
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Central computer generated: " randomisation list that was stratified by centre and prepared in advance by one author" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Patients were centrally randomised using an email assignment from one of the authors |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 10/146 (14%) withdrew from study due to transfer to another technique, thrombosis or vascular access infection, withdrawal of consent, transfer to another centre, transfer to another study, infection) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Key patient relevant outcomes not reported |
Other bias | High risk | Interventions and patient characteristics not matched; industry support provided |