Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;2015(5):CD006258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006258.pub2

Kantartzi 2013.

Methods
  • Study design: cross‐over RCT

  • Study time frame: not stated

  • Duration of follow‐up: 3 months on each dialysis technique

Participants
  • Country: Greece

  • Setting: single centre

  • Age > 18 years, regular (for at least 3 months) HD 3 times/week

    • Mean time on dialysis: 31 ± 23.28 months

  • Number: 24

  • Mean age ± SD: 62 ± 13.34 years

  • Sex (M/F): 19/5

  • Exclusion criteria: not stated

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • On‐line high‐flux HDF


Treatment group 2
  • High‐flux HDF with prepared bags of substitution (HDF)


Control group
  • Low‐flux conventional HD

Outcomes
  • QoL

  • Kt/V

  • B2 microglobulin

Notes
  • Exclusions post randomisation but pre‐intervention: not stated

  • Stop or end point/s: not stated

  • Funding: not stated, "The authors report no conflicts of interest."

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Lost to follow‐up 2/24; no clear description of drop‐outs or reasons
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Data at the end of first phase of treatment not available
Other bias High risk Carry over effect due to cross‐over design, interventions not matched