Skip to main content
. 2015 May 20;2015(5):CD006258. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006258.pub2

NCT02374372.

Trial name or title Prospective randomized study comparing the hemodiafiltration on‐line and conventional hemodialysis in terms of cost‐benefit
Methods Country: Canada
Allocation: randomised
Endpoint classification: efficacy study
Intervention model: parallel assignment
Masking: open label
Primary purpose: treatment
Participants Chronic renal failure; haemodialysis
Interventions Active comparator: conventional haemodialysis
Active comparator: haemodiafiltration on‐line haemodiafiltration
Outcomes Compare the medication cost between the 2 groups (HD and HDF) (time frame: 3 years)
Demonstrate lower cost of erythropoietin in HDF, with same control of anaemia to HD group (time frame: 3 years)
Demonstrate lower cost of phosphate binder in HDF, with same control of phospho‐calcium balance to HD group (time frame: 3 years)
Demonstrate lower need of erythropoietin and best control of anaemia in HDF (time frame: 3 years)
Demonstrate lower need of phosphate binder and best control of phospho‐calcium balance in HDF (time frame: 3 years)
Demonstrate less hospitalisation stay and cost related in HDF group (time frame: 3 years)
Stabilisation or regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (time frame: 3 years)
Starting date January 2011
Contact information Renée Lévesque, MD, renee.levesque@sympatico.ca
Marie‐Line Caron, B.Sc, marie‐line.caron.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Notes Estimated completion date: June 2016
Source: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02374372