Table 1.
Predictors | Court
Offers MAT |
Number
of Court Participants Receiving MAT |
---|---|---|
Level | Level | |
Medicaid expansion state (Yes = 1; 0 = No) | State (3) | State (3) |
State mandates the types of treatment programs and services used (1 = Yes; 0 = No) | State (3) | n/a |
State mandates MAT training for court staff (1 = Yes; 0 = No) | n/a | State (3) |
State mandates eligibility criteria to admit participants to PSC (1 = Yes; 0 = No) | n/a | State (3) |
Percent of population that is opioid dependent | County (2) | County (2) |
Drug overdose mortality rate (deaths/100k pop) | County (2) | County (2) |
Buprenorphine patient capacity (patient limit/1k pop) | County (2) | n/a |
Methadone providers (providers/100k pop.) | County (2) | n/a |
Naltrexone providers (providers/100k pop.) | County (2) | n/a |
PSC type (substance use = 1; other = 0) | Court (1) | Court (1) |
There is a perception in the court that MAT is “just substituting one drug for another”a | Court (1) | n/a |
“Most participants in our court are not interested in MAT services”a | Court (1) | n/a |
PSC participants are given a choice over which MAT to receiveb | n/a | Court (1) |