Table 4.

Regression Results for Courts Authorizing Different Types of MAT.

Outcome	Predictor	Level	b	Odds Ratio	SE	z	p
Court offers buprenorphine n = 509 courts	Intercept	—	1.80	—	0.45	4.03	<0.001
	MAT substitutes one drug for another	Court	−0.77	0.46	0.16	−4.97	<0.001
	Buprenorphine patient capacity/1k	County	0.081	1.08	0.019	4.20	<0.001
	Medicaid expansion	State	0.70	2.01	0.27	2.62	<0.01
Court offers methadone n = 509 courts	Intercept	—	0.85	—	0.42	2.01	0.045
	Court type	Court	−0.051	0.95	0.26	−0.20	0.84
	MAT substitutes one drug for another	Court	−0.61	0.54	0.14	−4.48	<0.001
	Methadone providers/100k	County	0.50	1.65	0.16	3.17	<0.01
	Medicaid expansion	State	1.05	2.86	0.29	3.62	<0.001
	State mandates types of services	State	−0.55	0.58	0.26	−2.08	0.038
Court offers naltrexone n = 509 courts	Intercept	—	1.38	—	0.56	2.45	0.014
	Court type	Court	0.60	1.83	0.30	2.00	0.045
	MAT substitutes one drug for another	Court	−0.33	0.72	0.15	−2.15	0.031
	Naltrexone providers/100k	County	0.16	1.17	0.055	2.91	<0.01
	Medicaid expansion	State	0.50	1.65	0.39	1.28	0.20
	State mandates types of services	State	−0.68	0.51	0.37	−1.84	0.066