Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 29;3(1):59–70. doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00389-9

Table 1.

Summary of the results of free-energy calculations

Quantity No restraints Ω restraint rL and rP restraint Ω, rL and rP restraint
Grid PMF difference (kcal mol−1) ΔG(xB) = −19.7 ± 1.1a ΔGΩ(xB) = −13.2 ± 0.3 ΔGrL,rP(xB) = −17.7 ± 1.0 ΔGΩ,rL,rP(xB) = −17.0 ± 0.5
Orientation correction (kcal mol−1) NA ΔUΩ(xB) = 4.4 ± 0.3 NA ΔUΩ,rL,rP(xB) = 4.6 ± 0.3
Ligand RMSD correction (kcal mol−1) NA N/A ΔUrL(xB) = 0.6 ± 0.1 ΔUrL(xB) = 0.6 ± 0.1
Protein RMSD correction (kcal mol−1) NA NA ΔUrPrLxB = 0.3 ± 0.1 ΔUrPrLxB = 0.3 ± 0.1
ΔGV (kcal mol−1) 3.7 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2
ΔG°(kcal mol−1) −16.0 ± 1.2 −6.3 ± 0.5 −14.5 ± 1.0 −8.7 ± 0.7
Kd (μM)b O(10−6) 25 O(10−5) 0.5
Kd range (μM)c 10−7–10−5 11–58 10−6–10−4 0.2−2.0

We are comparing the ΔG° of four different restraining methods (see ‘BEUS simulations’ in Methods for details).

aAll error estimates are based on 1 s.d.

bEquilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) values are determined directly from mean absolute binding-free-energy (ΔG°) values using relation (2).

cKd range is determined from the lower and upper limits of ΔG° values (mean ± s.d.) using relation (2). The experimentally determined Kd and ΔG° were 1.68 ± 0.03 μM and −7.88 ± 0.01 kcal mol−1, respectively (see Fig. 4). The orientation angle of heparin with respect to the protein (Ω), RMSD of the protein (rP), RMSD of heparin (rL), and the contribution of the difference between the volume of the binding pocket and the bulk to the binding free energy (ΔGV). ΔG(xB), ΔGΩ(xB), ΔGrL,rPxB and ΔGΩ,rL,rPxB are the PMF difference between the binding pocket center and the bulk associated with respective restraints. NA means the data are not applicable in the corresponding section. ΔUΩ(xB), ΔUΩrL,rPxB, ΔUrLxB and ΔUrPrLxB are correction terms associated with restraints (see ‘Theoretical foundation’ in Methods for details).