Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 4;14:526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51241-1

Table 5.

Comparison of baseline demographic, dry eye symptoms and signs between two subgroups of participants identified from latent profile analysis of baseline tear cytokines.

Baseline characteristic Subgroup 1
(n = 23 participants, 46 eyes)
Subgroup 2
(n = 108 participants, 216 eyes)
p-value
Person-level characteristics
 Age (year): Mean (SD) 54.2 (13.2) 54.2 (14.3) 0.99
 Gender: Female (%) 19 (82.6%) 86 (79.6%) 0.74
 Race (%)
  White 14 (60.9%) 63 (58.3%) 0.41
  Black 2 (8.7%) 14 (13.0%)
  Asian 3 (13.0%) 5 (4.6%)
  Other 4 (17.4%) 26 (24.1%)
 Sjogren syndrome: Yes (%) 3 (13.6%) 5 (4.9%) 0.13
 OSDI score: higher is worse, Mean (SD)
  Total 40.0 (17.21) 42.4 (14.95) 0.50
  Environmental triggers subscale 50.0 (26.76) 55.1 (27.07) 0.42
  Ocular symptoms subscale 38.8 (19.88) 44.6 (18.20) 0.17
  Vision-related function subscale 35.6 (20.84) 35.0 (19.86) 0.91
Dry eye signs: Mean (SD)
 Conjunctival lissamine staining score,higher is worse 3.38 (1.71) 2.69 (1.29) 0.04
 Corneal fluorescein staining score: higher is worse 4.26 (2.33) 3.03 (2.70) 0.03
 Tear break-up time (sec), lower is worse 3.01 (1.11) 3.35 (1.65) 0.14
 Schirmer test (mm), lower is worse 8.20 (5.14) 13.72 (8.89)  < 0.001
 Meibomian gland dysfunction, higher is worse 1.97 (0.99) 1.94 (1.03) 0.87
 Tear osmolarity (mOsms/L), lower is worse 296.95 (9.40) 301.28 (16.70) 0.06
 Composite dry eye severity score*: higher is worse 0.62 (0.27) 0.45 (0.27) 0.002

Significant values are in [bold].

*The composite dry eye severity score, ranging from 0 to 1 was calculated from tear break-up time, anesthetized Schirmer’s test, corneal and conjunctival staining, and meibomian gland dysfunction.