Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 5.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2023 Aug 10;381(6658):686–693. doi: 10.1126/science.adg8758

Fig. 4. Abrasion resistance, stretchability, and biocompatibility of BASC films.

Fig. 4.

(A) Schematic diagram illustrating physical abrasions that can happen on the surfaces of implantable devices. (B) Photographs showing a BASC film and a p(g2T-T) film before and after abrasion by a PTFE-covered glass plate under 1 kPa for 500 cycles. The arrows indicate the direction of the abrasion. (C) Changes of OECT on-current from the two films after the abrasion cycles along the charge transport direction. Values represent the mean and the standard deviation (n = 4-5). (D) Schematic illustrating a BASC film under stretching. The bottom photograph shows a stretched BASC film on a PDMS substrate at 100 % strain. (E) Optical microscopy and AFM images showing a BASC film stretched to 100 % strain without forming cracks. (F) Transfer curves of BASC films in the pristine state, and stretched to 100 % strain for 1 and 100 cycles, which were measured with Vd = −0.6 V. (G to H) Masson’s trichrome staining of surrounded tissues of a subcutaneously implanted BASC film (G) and a SEBS film (control, H) after one month in mice. (I) Calculated fibrotic capsule thickness. (J to M) Immunofluorescence staining of α-SMA for fibroblasts (yellow, J and L) and CD68 for macrophages (red, K and M). Statistical significance and P values are determined by two-sided Student’s t-test: ns, not significant; **P<0.01.