Table 2. Summary of methodological quality assessment scores.
| Study | Eligibility Criteria | Random Allocation | Allocation Concealment | Baseline Comparability | Blind Therapist | Blind Assessor | Follow up | Intention to Treat Analysis | Between Group Comparisons | Point Measure and Variability | Total PEDro Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH,P (2017) [53] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Liu et al. (2021) [54] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Ko et al. (2021) [55] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Fuentes et al. (2021) [36] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Suppiah, 2019 [56] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Fernandez et al. (2012) [57] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Wee et al. (2017) [58] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kilit and Arslan, (2019) [24] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Rodríguez et al. (2017) [59] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Fernande et al. (2017) [60] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |