Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 27;111(1):znad336. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad336

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Mantel–Haenszel statistical method with random-effects analysis model and OR as output only for included observational studies and RCT, and funnel plots assessing respective variance

Forest plots analysing crude event numbers between robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. a Clavien–Dindo grade III complications. b Skin necrosis. c Nipple necrosis. d Wound dehiscence. Overall heterogeneity for the respective outcomes was considered acceptable (less than 30 per cent) given the nature of the included studies. RNSM, robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy; CNSM, conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy; M-H, Mantel–Haenszel; SE, standard error.