Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;33(4):872–890. doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09569-w

Table 3.

Estimates of mean bilateral redundancy gain (bRG) by patient group

Sample bRG Test statistics
Reference Group Nobs Ncases ke ks meana s.e CI95% t–value df p dmb
Average Pure callosotomy 16 4 13 5 66.6 6.6 53.7; 79.6 10.1 12.33  < 0.001 2.77
Commissurotomy 8 3 5 3 101 14.5 72.6; 129.4 c
All complete section 24 7 15 6 82 10.6 61.2; 102.9 7.72 9.36  < 0.001 2.45
Anterior–medial section 2 2 1 1 22.7 8.4 6.2; 39.0
Medial–posterior 1 1 1 1 119.3
All partial section 3 3 1 1 54.9 32.6 –9.0; 118.7
Minimum Pure callosotomy 25 7 12 6 36.6 7.9 21.1; 52.1 4.625 7.4 0.002 1.35
Commissurotomy 10 3 6 3 51.9 10.4 31.5; 72.2
All complete section 35 10 14 7 42.8 8.0 27.1; 58.4 5.35 15.5  < 0.001 1.41
Anterior–medial section 14 6 4 2 30.3 6.2 18.1; 42.4
Medial–posterior 1 1 1 1 45.5
All partial section 15 7 4 2 30.8 7.1 16.8; 44.7 4.32 7.6 0.003 1.45
Ipsilateral Pure callosotomy 12 5 9 5 26.2 4.6 17.2; 35.1
Commissurotomy 8 2 5 3 55.0 15.5 24.6; 85.3
All complete section 20 7 11 6 38.9 9.4 20.4; 57.3 4.12 11.0 0.002 1.23
Anterior–medial section 5 5 2 2 11.6 4.9 1.9; 21.2
Medial–posterior 1 1 1 1 45.5
All partial section 6 6 2 2 17.2 6.9 3.6; 30.8

Nobs number of observations, Ncases number of cases, ke number of experiments/conditions, ks number of studies

afixed intercept in linear–mixed model (LMM)

bCohen’ d against “zero” estimated from the model variance

cnot available as number of observations did not allow LMM estimates