Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 27;309(1):195–204. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07222-2

Table 2.

Current status of digitalization in obstetrics and gynecology in Germany

Characteristic Value
Possibility of performing robotic surgery—no. (%)
 Yes 29 (32.6)
 No 60 (67.4)
 No answer 2
Number of days per week with possibility to perform robotic surgery—median (25th, 75th percentile) 1 (1, 2.5)
Willingness to participate in app-based trials for rare disease (e.g., granulosa cell tumors)—no. (%)
 Yes 71 (80.7)
 No 17 (19.3)
 No answer 3
Performing studies in the area digital medicine in obstetrics and gynecology—no. (%)
 Yes 16 (18.0)
 No 73 (82.0)
 No answer 2)
Number of known medical apps—median (25th, 75th percentile)
 Digital companion apps 2 (0, 3)
 Decision support apps 2 (0, 3)
Number of medical apps used personally—median (25, 75 percentile) 2 (0, 3)
Personal use of medical wearables—no. (%)
 Yes 26 (29.5)
 No 62 (70.5)
 No answer 3
Prescription of DIGAs (Digital Health Applications)—no. (%)
 Yes 9 (10.2)
 No 79 (89.8)
 No answer 3
Among those who currently do not prescribe DIGAs
 Planning to prescribe DIGAs (Digital Health Applications) in the future among those who currently do not prescribe them—no. (%)
  Yes 11 (14.3)
  No 66 (85.7)
  No answer 2
 Reasons for not prescribing DIGAs—no. (%.)
  Did not know about it 31 (42.5)
  Complicated prescription process 17 (23.3)
  Lack of monetary compensation 13 (17.8)
  Lack of evidence 8 (11.0)
 Specialty with highest potential for DIGAs—no. (%.)
  Gynecologic oncology (including senology) 46 (65.7)
  Fertility and endocrinology 26 (37.1)
  Obstetrics 26 (37.1)
  Others 2 (2.8)
  No answer 9
Among those who currently prescribe DIGAs
 Number of prescribed DIGAs—median (25th, 75th percentile) 1 (1, 2)
 Specialty with highest potential for DIGAs—no. (%.)
  Gynecologic oncology (including senology) 7 (77.8)
  Fertility and endocrinology 1 (11.1)
  Obstetrics 1 (11.1)
  Obesity 2 (22.2)
  Vaginismus 1 (11.1)
 Kind of prescribed DIGA—no. (%.)
  Digital companion 5 (62.5)
  Digital monitoring 5 (62.5)
  Wearables 1 (12.5)
 Offers telemedical appointments—no. (%)
  Yes 12 (14.0)
  No 74 (86.0)
  No answer 5
Among those who currently do not offer telemedical appointments
 Planning to offer telemedical appointments in the future among those who currently do not prescribe them—no. (%)
  Yes 9 (12.7)
  No 62 (87.3)
  No answer 3
 Reasons for not offering telemedical appointments—no. (%.)
  Did not know about it 11 (16.7)
  Complicated prescription process 16 (24.2)
  Lack of monetary compensation 19 (28.8)
  Lack of evidence 7 (10.6)
 Specialty with highest potential for telemedical appointments—no. (%.)
  Gynecologic oncology (including senology) 43 (62.3)
  Fertility and endocrinology 33 (47.8)
  Obstetrics 11 (15.9)
  Others 3 (4.2)
  No answer 5
Among those who currently offer telemedical appointments
 Frequency of telemedical appointments—no. (%.)
  Very often 1 (8.3)
  Often 4 (33.3)
  Sometimes 6 (50)
  Rarely 1 (8.3)
 In which specialty do you offer telemedical appointments—no. (%.)
  Gynecologic oncology (including senology) 8 (66.7)
  Fertility and endocrinology 5 (11.7)
  Obstetrics 3 (25)
  Psychotherapy 1 (8.3)