Table 3.
Comparison of dye adsorption performance of various studies.
| Treatment Technology | Type of solution | Applied materials | Removal percentage % |
References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adsorption | Leather dyeing wastewater | Graphene Oxide-Keratin nanocomposite | 98.8 | This Study |
| Adsorption | Reactive black 5 dye | Keratin based adsorbent | 95.3 | [22] |
| Adsorption | Reactive brilliant blue KN-R dye | Keratin composite film | 98.52 | [55] |
| Adsorption | Synthetic Azo Dye | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | 97.78 % | [54] |
| Adsorption | Acid Blue 161 dye | Tannery cattle hair waste | 70.82 | [56] |
| Adsorption | Post tanning effluent | Keratin-Polysulfone Blend Membranes | 76 | [57] |
| Adsorption | Tannery effluent with cationic dyes | Graphene Oxide | 91.2 | [58] |
| Adsorption | Methylene Blue dye | GO-SiO2-AR | 95.08 | [59] |
| Adsorption | Textile wastewater | Graphene oxide | 90 | [60] |
| Adsorption | Acid red 27 | Polypyrrole/SrFe12O12/Graphene Oxide | 99 % | [66] |
| Adsorption | Methylene Blue | Graphene Oxide | 99 % | [67] |